Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Department of Public Health and Graduate Program in Dentistry, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2022 Mar 14;36:e045. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0045. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to assess the fidelity of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention with caregivers of young children in primary healthcare in Southern Brazil. Seven trained interventionists conducted one MI session with each caregiver at their home. The sessions were audio-recorded and a randomly selected subset (n = 109) was coded by a single reviewer using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 3.1.1. criteria (MITI 3.1.1.). This instrument establishes parameters of MI proficiency for beginners and experts measuring the global ratings of five MI principles (evocation, collaboration, autonomy/support, direction and empathy), the global MI spirit score, and the behavior counts of MI basic skills: to inform, to ask, and to listen. The mean global MI spirit rating was 4.0 (95%CI 3.9-4.1). Mean MI principle scores ranged from 3.8 (95%CI 3.7-3.9) to 4.3 (95%CI 4.2-4.4). The overall reflection-to-question ratio was 0.9 (95 CI 0.8-1.0), % open questions was 76.3 (95%CI 73.1-79.6), % complex reflections was 66.1 (95%CI 63.1-69.1), and % MI-adherent information was 94.1 (95%CI 93.5-94.5). Interventionists with higher scores conducted more and longer sessions than those with lower scores (p = 0.012). Those with beginner proficiency had a higher proportion of caregivers changing their oral health knowledge (p = 0.005). In conclusion, a good degree of MI fidelity was found, with higher fidelity among interventionists who conducted more interviews and spent more time talking with caregivers.
本研究旨在评估在巴西南部初级保健中对幼儿照顾者进行动机访谈(MI)干预的忠实度。七名经过培训的干预者在照顾者家中与每位照顾者进行一次 MI 会谈。会谈被录音,然后由一名评审员使用动机访谈治疗完整性 3.1.1 标准(MITI 3.1.1.)对随机选择的一个子集(n=109)进行编码。该工具为初学者和专家设定了 MI 熟练程度的参数,衡量了五项 MI 原则(唤起、合作、自主/支持、指导和同理心)的总体评分、总体 MI 精神评分以及 MI 基本技能的行为计数:告知、提问和倾听。平均 MI 精神评分得分为 4.0(95%CI 3.9-4.1)。MI 原则评分从 3.8(95%CI 3.7-3.9)到 4.3(95%CI 4.2-4.4)不等。总体反思与提问比为 0.9(95 CI 0.8-1.0),开放性问题的比例为 76.3%(95%CI 73.1-79.6%),复杂反思的比例为 66.1%(95%CI 63.1-69.1%),MI 一致信息的比例为 94.1%(95%CI 93.5-94.5%)。得分较高的干预者进行的会谈次数更多,时间更长,而得分较低的干预者则较少(p=0.012)。那些具有初级专业水平的干预者,有更多的照顾者改变了他们的口腔健康知识(p=0.005)。结论是,发现了良好程度的 MI 忠实度,在与照顾者进行更多访谈和花更多时间交谈的干预者中,忠实度更高。