Suppr超能文献

南非二价、四价和九价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的成本效益分析。

Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa.

机构信息

Fifth Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Apr;42(4):333-343. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In South Africa, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, such as cervical cancer and genital warts, is among the highest in the world. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent HPV vaccination for 9- to 14-year-old girls from the South African healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model portraying the natural HPV disease progression from high-risk infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II/III, or cervical cancer and from low-risk infection to genital warts was built. Transition probability, utility, and efficacy data were sourced from peer-reviewed literature. Vaccination costs were calculated based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The model was populated with a cohort of 520,000 9-year-old girls to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in South African Rand (R) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for each vaccination strategy.

RESULTS

All HPV vaccination strategies dominate the no vaccine strategy. Compared with the bivalent vaccine, the nonavalent strategy increases QALYs by 0.14 and costs by R1793 (ICER: R13,013 per QALY) per person, while the quadrivalent vaccination provides -0.02 incremental QALYs and R1748 costs (ICER: -R116,397 per QALY). Consequently, at the South African willingness-to-pay threshold of R23,630 per QALY, nonavalent vaccination is the preferred strategy, with a probability of 90.2%. Scenario analysis demonstrated that results are influenced by vaccine coverage, efficacy, and duration of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of nonavalent for bivalent HPV vaccination is a cost-effective intervention in South Africa. HPV vaccination should be part of a multifaceted public health strategy entailing screening, condoms, and education of all stakeholders to reduce the significant burden of sexual transmitted diseases in South Africa. Sex-neutral and catch-up vaccinations are subjects for further research.

摘要

背景与目的

在南非,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的流行率以及宫颈癌和生殖器疣等相关疾病的流行率均位居世界前列。本研究从南非医疗保健系统的角度评估了二价、四价和九价 HPV 疫苗接种对 9 至 14 岁女童的成本效益。

方法

构建了一个马尔可夫模型,用于描述高危 HPV 感染向宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)I、CIN II/III 或宫颈癌以及低危 HPV 感染向生殖器疣的自然 HPV 疾病进展。转移概率、效用和疗效数据来源于同行评议文献。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南计算疫苗接种成本。使用 52 万名 9 岁女童的队列对模型进行了填充,以计算每种疫苗接种策略的增量成本效益比(ICER),即每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。

结果

所有 HPV 疫苗接种策略均优于不接种疫苗策略。与二价疫苗相比,九价疫苗增加了 0.14 个 QALY,但成本增加了 1793 南非兰特(R)(每 QALY 成本为 13013 R),而四价疫苗接种提供了 0.02 个增量 QALY 和 1748 R 成本(每 QALY 成本为-116397 R)。因此,在南非 23630 兰特/QALY 的支付意愿阈值下,九价疫苗接种是首选策略,概率为 90.2%。敏感性分析表明,结果受疫苗覆盖率、疗效和疗效持续时间的影响。

结论

在南非,引入九价疫苗接种替代二价 HPV 疫苗接种是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。HPV 疫苗接种应作为包括筛查、使用避孕套和对所有利益相关者进行教育的多方面公共卫生策略的一部分,以减轻南非性传播疾病的巨大负担。中性和补种疫苗接种是进一步研究的课题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1021/8989937/06adeabd94ce/40261_2022_1138_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验