Suppr超能文献

被膜葡萄球菌的调理作用与血清补体激活之间的二分法。

Dichotomy between opsonization and serum complement activation by encapsulated staphylococci.

作者信息

Peterson P K, Kim Y, Wilkinson B J, Schmeling D, Michael A F, Quie P G

出版信息

Infect Immun. 1978 Jun;20(3):770-5. doi: 10.1128/iai.20.3.770-775.1978.

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that encapsulated Staphylococcus aureus strains are not effectively opsonized by the serum complement system. Encapsulated staphylococci thereby "resist phagocytosis." To test whether this phenomenon might be explained by an inability of encapsulated strains to activate complement, the relationship between staphylococcal opsonization and serum complement activation was studied. Although encapsulation was found to interfere with opsonization by pooled human serum (human polymorphonuclear leukocytes phagocytized significantly fewer encapsulated bacteria than unencapsulated bacteria after incubation in this opsonic source), encapsulated (S. aureus M and Smith diffuse) and unencapsulated (S. aureus M variant and Smith compact) strains had similar capacities for complement activation as measured by C3-C9 consumption. When C2-deficient and immunoglobulin-deficient sera were studied, again C3-C9 consumption was not influenced by the presence or absence of a capsule. In addition, C3 was detected on the surface of both S. aureus M and M variant strains after incubation in pooled serum and staining with fluorescein-conjugated anti-C3 antibody. Thus, encapsulated staphylococci are not effectively opsonized even though complement is activated and C3 is present on the bacterial surface. The exact mechanism by which the capsule interferes with opsonization is still not known; however, inhibition of complement activation appears not to be the explanation of this phenomenon.

摘要

先前的研究表明,包膜化的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株不能被血清补体系统有效地调理吞噬。因此,包膜化葡萄球菌“抵抗吞噬作用”。为了检验这种现象是否可以用包膜化菌株无法激活补体来解释,研究了葡萄球菌调理吞噬作用与血清补体激活之间的关系。虽然发现包膜化会干扰人混合血清的调理吞噬作用(在这种调理吞噬来源中孵育后,人类多形核白细胞吞噬的包膜化细菌明显少于未包膜化细菌),但通过C3 - C9消耗测定,包膜化(金黄色葡萄球菌M型和史密斯弥漫型)和未包膜化(金黄色葡萄球菌M变异型和史密斯紧密型)菌株具有相似的补体激活能力。当研究C2缺陷血清和免疫球蛋白缺陷血清时,C3 - C9消耗同样不受包膜存在与否的影响。此外,在混合血清中孵育并用荧光素偶联的抗C3抗体染色后,在金黄色葡萄球菌M型和M变异型菌株的表面均检测到C3。因此,即使补体被激活且细菌表面存在C3,包膜化葡萄球菌也不能被有效地调理吞噬。包膜干扰调理吞噬作用的确切机制仍然未知;然而,补体激活的抑制似乎不是这种现象的解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/625a/421925/94372db6de78/iai00198-0187-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验