Chen Bijun, Li Ruoshui, Kubota Akihiko, Alex Linda, Frangogiannis Nikolaos G
The Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue Forchheimer G46B, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08278-x.
Reliable tools for macrophage identification in mouse tissues are critical for studies investigating inflammatory and reparative responses. Transgenic reporter mice and anti-macrophage antibodies have been used as "specific pan-macrophage" markers in many studies; however, organ-specific patterns of expression and non-specific labeling of other cell types, such as fibroblasts, may limit their usefulness. Our study provides a systematic comparison of macrophage labeling patterns in normal and injured mouse tissues, using the CX3CR1 and CSF1R macrophage reporter lines and anti-macrophage antibodies. Moreover, we tested the specificity of macrophage antibodies using the fibroblast-specific PDGFR[Formula: see text] reporter line. Mouse macrophages exhibit organ-specific differences in expression of macrophage markers. Hepatic macrophages are labeled for CSF1R, Mac2 and F4/80, but lack CX3CR1 expression, whereas in the lung, the CSF1R+/Mac2+/Mac3+ macrophage population is not labeled with F4/80. In the splenic red pulp, subpopulations of CSF1R+/F4/80+/Mac3+cells were labeled with Mac2, CX3CR1 and lysozyme M. In the kidney, Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M labeled a fraction of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ macrophages, but also stained tubular epithelial cells. In normal hearts, the majority of CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ cells were not detected with anti-macrophage antibodies. Myocardial infarction was associated with marked expansion of the CSF1R+ and CX3CR1+ populations that peaked during the proliferative phase of cardiac repair, and also expressed Mac2, Mac3 and lysozyme M. In normal mouse tissues, a small fraction of cells labeled with anti-macrophage antibodies were identified as PDGFR[Formula: see text]+ fibroblasts, using a reporter system. The population of PDGFR[Formula: see text]+ cells expressing macrophage markers expanded following injury, likely reflecting emergence of cellular phenotypes with both fibroblast and macrophage characteristics. In conclusion, mouse macrophages exhibit remarkable heterogeneity. Selection of the most appropriate markers for identification of macrophages in mouse tissues is dependent on the organ and the pathologic condition studied.
在研究炎症和修复反应的过程中,用于鉴定小鼠组织中巨噬细胞的可靠工具至关重要。在许多研究中,转基因报告小鼠和抗巨噬细胞抗体已被用作“特异性全巨噬细胞”标记物;然而,器官特异性的表达模式以及其他细胞类型(如成纤维细胞)的非特异性标记,可能会限制它们的实用性。我们的研究使用CX3CR1和CSF1R巨噬细胞报告系以及抗巨噬细胞抗体,对正常和损伤小鼠组织中的巨噬细胞标记模式进行了系统比较。此外,我们使用成纤维细胞特异性的PDGFRα报告系测试了巨噬细胞抗体的特异性。小鼠巨噬细胞在巨噬细胞标记物的表达上表现出器官特异性差异。肝巨噬细胞表达CSF1R、Mac2和F4/80,但缺乏CX3CR1表达,而在肺中,CSF1R+/Mac2+/Mac3+巨噬细胞群体不被F4/80标记。在脾红髓中,CSF1R+/F4/80+/Mac3+细胞亚群被Mac2、CX3CR1和溶菌酶M标记。在肾脏中,Mac2、Mac3和溶菌酶M标记了一部分CSF1R+和CX3CR1+巨噬细胞,但也对肾小管上皮细胞进行了染色。在正常心脏中,大多数CSF1R+和CX3CR1+细胞不能被抗巨噬细胞抗体检测到。心肌梗死与CSF1R+和CX3CR1+群体的显著扩增有关,在心脏修复的增殖期达到峰值,并且还表达Mac2、Mac3和溶菌酶M。在正常小鼠组织中,使用报告系统将一小部分被抗巨噬细胞抗体标记的细胞鉴定为PDGFRα+成纤维细胞。表达巨噬细胞标记物的PDGFRα+细胞群体在损伤后扩增,这可能反映了具有成纤维细胞和巨噬细胞特征的细胞表型的出现。总之,小鼠巨噬细胞表现出显著的异质性。选择最合适的标记物来鉴定小鼠组织中的巨噬细胞取决于所研究的器官和病理状况。