School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Apr;49(2):219-230. doi: 10.1177/10901981221084272. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increases in U.S. residents' stressors while limiting many of the resources previously available to cope with stress. Coping behaviors may contribute to the prevention or proliferation of psychological distress during and after the pandemic. Understanding these coping behaviors and associated psychological outcomes can help health educators develop programs that encourage effective coping and promote mental health. This study used a sequential mixed-methods approach informed by Roth and Cohen's conceptualization of coping to understand the use of approach coping behaviors- which are active and directed toward the perceived threat-and avoidance coping behaviors-which include activity directed away from perceived threat during the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. residents ( = 2,987) were surveyed online in April 2020 and again in September 2021. Open-ended responses at baseline were thematically analyzed to illustrate coping behaviors in participants' own words. At baseline, more than half (56%) of the sample met criteria for probable depression, 51% for acute stress symptoms, and 42% for moderate to severe hopelessness. At follow-up, 45% meet criteria for probable depression and 23% for acute stress. However, the proportion of the sample who reported moderate to severe hopelessness increased to 48%. We used mixed-effects general linear models to examine changes over time and found that increases in approach coping behaviors were associated with decreases in depressive symptoms and hopelessness; increases in avoidance coping were associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms and higher levels of hopelessness. Increases in both types of coping were associated with increases in acute stress symptoms related to COVID-19. Although there was some attenuation in distress in our sample between April 2020 and September 2021, our findings suggest a need for interventions that encourage the use of approach coping behaviors and that both increase access to and decrease stigma for mental health support.
新冠疫情大流行导致美国居民的压力源增加,同时限制了许多以前用于应对压力的资源。应对行为可能会导致在疫情期间和之后出现心理困扰的预防或扩散。了解这些应对行为及其相关的心理结果可以帮助健康教育工作者制定鼓励有效应对和促进心理健康的计划。本研究采用了一种基于 Roth 和 Cohen 的应对概念化的顺序混合方法,以了解在新冠疫情期间使用趋近应对行为(即积极应对和针对感知威胁)和回避应对行为(即包括远离感知威胁的活动)的情况。2020 年 4 月和 2021 年 9 月,通过在线调查对美国居民(n=2987)进行了调查。对基线时的开放性回答进行了主题分析,以用参与者自己的话说明应对行为。基线时,超过一半(56%)的样本符合可能患有抑郁症的标准,51%符合急性应激症状标准,42%符合中度至重度绝望标准。随访时,45%符合可能患有抑郁症的标准,23%符合急性应激症状标准。然而,报告中度至重度绝望的样本比例增加到 48%。我们使用混合效应一般线性模型来检验随时间的变化,发现趋近应对行为的增加与抑郁症状和绝望感的降低有关;回避应对行为的增加与抑郁症状的升高和绝望感的升高有关。两种类型的应对行为的增加都与与新冠相关的急性应激症状的增加有关。尽管我们的样本在 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 9 月之间的痛苦程度有所减轻,但我们的研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施,鼓励使用趋近应对行为,并增加获取心理健康支持的机会,同时减少对其的污名化。