Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Facebook, Menlo Park, CA, United States.
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;67:1604430. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604430. eCollection 2022.
To examine the association of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) with anxiety and depressive symptoms among adults and determine if these associations varied by gender and age. We combined survey data from 16,177,184 adults from 43 countries who participated in the daily COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey Facebook with time-varying NPI data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker between 24 April 2020 and 20 December 2020. Using logistic regression models, we examined the association of [1] overall NPI stringency and [2] seven individual NPIs (school closures, workplace closures, cancellation of public events, restrictions on the size of gatherings, stay-at-home requirements, restrictions on internal movement, and international travel controls) with anxiety and depressive symptoms. More stringent implementation of NPIs was associated with a higher odds of anxiety and depressive symptoms, albeit with very small effect sizes. Individual NPIs had heterogeneous associations with anxiety and depressive symptoms by gender and age. Governments worldwide should be prepared to address the possible mental health consequences of stringent NPI implementation with both universal and targeted interventions for vulnerable groups.
为了研究非药物干预(NPIs)与成年人焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关联,并确定这些关联是否因性别和年龄而异。我们结合了来自 43 个国家的 16177184 名成年人的调查数据,这些成年人参加了每日 COVID-19 趋势和影响调查 Facebook 与 2020 年 4 月 24 日至 2020 年 12 月 20 日牛津 COVID-19 政府反应追踪器的时变 NPI 数据。使用逻辑回归模型,我们研究了[1]总体 NPI 严格程度和[2]七种个别 NPIs(学校关闭、工作场所关闭、取消公共活动、集会规模限制、居家要求、内部流动限制和国际旅行管制)与焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关联。NPIs 的实施越严格,焦虑和抑郁症状的几率就越高,尽管效果非常小。个别 NPIs 对焦虑和抑郁症状的关联因性别和年龄而异。全世界各国政府都应该准备好应对严格实施 NPI 可能带来的心理健康后果,为弱势群体提供普遍和有针对性的干预措施。