Institut für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studiengang Physiotherapie, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Laboratory of Pain Research, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
Headache. 2022 Mar;62(3):241-270. doi: 10.1111/head.14281.
To summarize the evidence regarding static and dynamic balance alterations among patients with headache.
Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched by two researchers independently up to September 2021. Two reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Downs and Black checklist. Case-control studies were included if they involved balance assessment of any kind of headache, including objective outcome measures of dynamic and static tests such as body sway displacement, limits of stability (LOS), gait, and tandem walk tests. A meta-analysis and post hoc sensitivity analyses were performed when possible.
Twenty-two studies (1202 patients with headache and 597 controls) were included in this review and 16 of them in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate among all studies. Greater sway area in static posturography was shown by patients with migraine in comparison to controls, with more consistent differences in more challenging test conditions, such as over a foam surface with eyes closed (difference of 4.8 cm , 95% CI: 3.8-5.9). Lower performance of patients with migraine during the tandem walk test (difference of -7.8 cm/s, 95% CI: -9.0 to -6.5) and slower reaction time in the LOS test (difference of 0.3 s, 95% CI: 0.2-0.4) were also verified. There is no evidence of altered sway velocity and length in static posturography among patients with migraine (p > 0.05). The level of evidence is very low for balance alteration of any kind among patients with tension-type and cervicogenic headache owing to the limited number of studies and high heterogeneity.
This review confirmed the presence of static and dynamic balance alterations among patients with migraine. Future studies with low risk of bias are needed to decrease heterogeneity in methodology and explore the role of subdiagnosis on the balance of patients with headache.
总结头痛患者静态和动态平衡改变的证据。
两位研究人员于 2021 年 9 月前分别在电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)中进行搜索。两位评审员选择合格的研究,提取数据,并使用 Downs 和 Black 清单评估证据质量。如果平衡评估包括任何类型的头痛,包括身体摆动位移、稳定性极限(LOS)、步态和串联行走测试等动态和静态测试的客观结果测量,则纳入病例对照研究。当可能时,进行了荟萃分析和事后敏感性分析。
本综述共纳入 22 项研究(1202 例头痛患者和 597 例对照),其中 16 项研究进行了荟萃分析。所有研究的偏倚风险均为低至中度。与对照组相比,偏头痛患者在静态姿势描记术中的摆动面积更大,在更具挑战性的测试条件下差异更为一致,例如在闭着眼睛的泡沫表面上(差异为 4.8cm,95%置信区间:3.8-5.9)。偏头痛患者在串联行走测试中的表现更差(差异为-7.8cm/s,95%置信区间:-9.0 至-6.5),在 LOS 测试中的反应时间也较慢(差异为 0.3s,95%置信区间:0.2-0.4)。偏头痛患者在静态姿势描记术中的摆动速度和长度没有改变(p>0.05)。由于研究数量有限且异质性较高,紧张型和颈源性头痛患者任何类型的平衡改变的证据水平均为极低。
本综述证实偏头痛患者存在静态和动态平衡改变。需要进行低偏倚风险的未来研究,以减少方法学的异质性,并探讨亚诊断对头痛患者平衡的作用。