Suppr超能文献

比较 GentleWave 系统和被动超声冲洗与微创和传统器械对感染根管中 LPS 的作用。

Comparison of GentleWave system and passive ultrasonic irrigation with minimally invasive and conventional instrumentation against LPS in infected root canals.

机构信息

Division of Endodontics, Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Maryland, School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08835-4.

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of GentleWave system (GWS) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) in removing lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from infected root canals after minimally invasive (MIT) and conventional instrumentation (CIT) techniques. Sixty first premolars with two roots were inoculated with fluorescent LPS conjugate (Alexa Fluor 594). Of those, twelve were dentin pretreated, inoculated with fluorescent LPS conjugate, and submitted to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to validate the LPS-infection model. Forty-eight teeth were randomly divided into treatment groups: GWS + MIT, GWS + CIT, PUI + MIT, and PUI + CIT (all, n = 12). Teeth were instrumented with Vortex Blue rotary file size 15/0.04 for MIT and 35/0.04 for CIT. Samples were collected before (s1) and after a root canal procedure (s2) and after cryogenically ground the teeth (s3) for intraradicular LPS analysis. LPS were quantified with LAL assay (KQCL test). GWS + MIT and GWS + CIT were the most effective protocols against LPS, with no difference between them (p > 0.05). PUI + CIT was more effective than PUI + MIT (p < 0.05) but less effective than GWS + MIT and GWS + CIT. GWS was the most effective protocol against LPS in infected root canals using MIT and CIT techniques.

摘要

本研究比较了 GentleWave 系统(GWS)和被动超声冲洗(PUI)在微创(MIT)和常规器械(CIT)技术后从感染根管中去除脂多糖(LPS)的效果。60 颗第一前磨牙有两个根,用荧光 LPS 缀合物(Alexa Fluor 594)接种。其中 12 颗进行了牙本质预处理,接种了荧光 LPS 缀合物,并进行了共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)检查以验证 LPS 感染模型。48 颗牙齿被随机分为治疗组:GWS+MIT、GWS+CIT、PUI+MIT 和 PUI+CIT(每组 n=12)。牙齿用 Vortex Blue 旋转锉 15/0.04 进行 MIT 处理,用 35/0.04 进行 CIT 处理。在根管操作前(s1)、根管操作后(s2)和牙齿冷冻研磨后(s3)采集样本,进行根管内 LPS 分析。用 LAL 检测法(KQCL 试验)定量 LPS。GWS+MIT 和 GWS+CIT 是针对 LPS 最有效的方案,两者之间没有差异(p>0.05)。PUI+CIT 比 PUI+MIT 更有效(p<0.05),但不如 GWS+MIT 和 GWS+CIT 有效。GWS 是使用 MIT 和 CIT 技术在感染根管中对抗 LPS 最有效的方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4465/8940914/000a822a212f/41598_2022_8835_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验