Sattar Schroder, Haase Kristen, Tejero Isabel, Bradley Cara, Mariano Caroline, Kilgour Heather, Verma Ridhi, Amir Eitan, Alibhai Shabbir
College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada.
Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;14(6):1582. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061582.
Cognitive impairment (CI) is common among older adults with cancer, but its effect on cancer outcomes is not known. This systematic review sought to identify research investigating clinical endpoints (toxicity risk, treatment completion, and survival) of chemotherapy treatment in those with baseline CI. A systematic search of five databases (inception to March 2021) was conducted. Eligible studies included randomized trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies in which the sample or a subgroup were older adults (aged ≥ 65) screened positive for CI prior to receiving chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Twenty-three articles were included. Sample sizes ranged from = 31 to 703. There was heterogeneity of cancer sites, screening tools and cut-offs used to ascertain CI, and proportion of patients with CI within study samples. Severity of CI and corresponding proportion of each level within study samples were unclear in all but one study. Among studies investigating CI in a qualified multivariable model, statistically significant findings were found in 4/6 studies on survival and in 1/1 study on nonhematological toxicity. The lack of robust evidence indicates a need for further research on the role of CI in predicting survival, treatment completion, and toxicity among older adults receiving chemotherapy, and the potential implications that could shape treatment decisions.
认知障碍(CI)在老年癌症患者中很常见,但其对癌症预后的影响尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在确定研究基线存在CI的患者化疗临床终点(毒性风险、治疗完成情况和生存率)的研究。对五个数据库(从创建至2021年3月)进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究包括随机试验、前瞻性研究和回顾性研究,其中样本或亚组为65岁及以上的老年人,在接受化疗前CI筛查呈阳性。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具进行偏倚风险评估。纳入了23篇文章。样本量从31到703不等。癌症部位、用于确定CI的筛查工具和临界值以及研究样本中CI患者的比例存在异质性。除一项研究外,所有研究中CI的严重程度及其在研究样本中各水平的相应比例均不明确。在合格多变量模型中研究CI的研究中,4/6项生存研究和1/1项非血液学毒性研究有统计学显著发现。缺乏有力证据表明,需要进一步研究CI在预测接受化疗的老年人的生存、治疗完成情况和毒性方面的作用,以及可能影响治疗决策的潜在影响。