Müller-Franzes Gustav, Nolte Teresa, Ciba Malin, Schock Justus, Khader Firas, Prescher Andreas, Wilms Lena Marie, Kuhl Christiane, Nebelung Sven, Truhn Daniel
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;12(3):688. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030688.
For T2 mapping, the underlying mono-exponential signal decay is traditionally quantified by non-linear Least-Squares Estimation (LSE) curve fitting, which is prone to outliers and computationally expensive. This study aimed to validate a fully connected neural network (NN) to estimate T2 relaxation times and to assess its performance versus LSE fitting methods. To this end, the NN was trained and tested in silico on a synthetic dataset of 75 million signal decays. Its quantification error was comparatively evaluated against three LSE methods, i.e., traditional methods without any modification, with an offset, and one with noise correction. Following in-situ acquisition of T2 maps in seven human cadaveric knee joint specimens at high and low signal-to-noise ratios, the NN and LSE methods were used to estimate the T2 relaxation times of the manually segmented patellofemoral cartilage. In-silico modeling at low signal-to-noise ratio indicated significantly lower quantification error for the NN (by medians of 6−33%) than for the LSE methods (p < 0.001). These results were confirmed by the in-situ measurements (medians of 10−35%). T2 quantification by the NN took only 4 s, which was faster than the LSE methods (28−43 s). In conclusion, NNs provide fast, accurate, and robust quantification of T2 relaxation times.
对于T2映射,传统上通过非线性最小二乘估计(LSE)曲线拟合来量化潜在的单指数信号衰减,这种方法容易受到异常值的影响且计算成本高昂。本研究旨在验证一个全连接神经网络(NN)来估计T2弛豫时间,并评估其与LSE拟合方法相比的性能。为此,在包含7500万个信号衰减的合成数据集上对该神经网络进行了计算机模拟训练和测试。将其量化误差与三种LSE方法进行了比较评估,即未作任何修改的传统方法、带偏移的方法以及一种进行了噪声校正的方法。在七个高信噪比和低信噪比的人体尸体膝关节标本中现场采集T2图谱后,使用神经网络和LSE方法来估计手动分割的髌股关节软骨的T2弛豫时间。在低信噪比下的计算机模拟建模表明,神经网络的量化误差(中位数为6 - 33%)显著低于LSE方法(p < 0.001)。现场测量结果(中位数为10 - 35%)证实了这些结果。神经网络进行T2量化仅需4秒,比LSE方法(28 - 43秒)更快。总之,神经网络能够快速、准确且稳健地量化T2弛豫时间。