Leipzig Heart Institute GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Community Psychology, University of Hagen (Fernuniversitaet), Hagen, Germany.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;57(8):1531-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02274-2. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
The purpose of the study was to investigate the changes in psychosocial and psychiatric services in the German city of Leipzig during the COVID-19-pandemic.
A participatory, mixed-methods study was used involving a quantitative online survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews with professionals. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data.
Fifty professionals from various mental health services participated in the survey and eleven professionals were interviewed. Quantitative findings showed that some services were closed intermittently and that there was a stiff increase in use of digital/telephonic service and a decrease in face-to-face services. Staff or funding did not change considerably during the pandemic. Psychosocial groups were suspended or reduced, while access to services became more difficult and professional training for staff was stopped. Thematic analysis of the interviews showed that professionals experienced different phases and levels of change during the pandemic, including changes on a structural level, on the users' level, and on the staff' level. Professionals particularly criticised the equivocality of COVID-19 regulations, a defective flow of information and lack of attention for mental healthcare in public policies. They also saw positive aspects, such as the capacity of users and the outpatient care system to adapt to the new situation.
This study suggests directions for policy and service development, such as communicating clearly in infection-control measures, fostering outpatient care and networks between services.
本研究旨在调查德国莱比锡市在 COVID-19 大流行期间心理社会和精神科服务的变化。
采用参与式混合方法研究,包括对专业人员进行定量在线调查和定性半结构化访谈。定量结果以描述性统计报告,定性数据进行主题分析。
共有来自各种心理健康服务机构的 50 名专业人员参与了调查,11 名专业人员接受了访谈。定量结果表明,一些服务间歇性关闭,数字/电话服务大幅增加,面对面服务减少。大流行期间,工作人员或资金没有明显变化。心理社会群体被暂停或减少,而获得服务的机会变得更加困难,工作人员的专业培训也停止了。访谈的主题分析表明,专业人员在大流行期间经历了不同的阶段和程度的变化,包括结构层面、用户层面和工作人员层面的变化。专业人员特别批评了 COVID-19 法规的模棱两可、信息流通不畅以及公共政策中对精神卫生保健的关注不足。他们还看到了积极的方面,例如用户和门诊护理系统适应新情况的能力。
本研究为政策和服务发展提供了方向,例如在感染控制措施中清晰沟通,促进门诊护理和服务之间的网络。