Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032, United States of America.
Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032, United States of America.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Aug;139:108770. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108770. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Successful retention on buprenorphine improves outcomes for opioid use disorder (OUD); however, we know little about associations between use of non-prescribed buprenorphine (NPB) preceding treatment intake and clinical outcomes.
The study conducted observational retrospective analysis of abstracted electronic health record (EHR) data from a multi-state nationwide office-based opioid treatment program. The study observed a random sample of 1000 newly admitted patients with OUD for buprenorphine maintenance (2015-2018) for up to 12 months following intake. We measured use of NPB by mandatory intake drug testing and manual EHR coding. Outcomes included hazards of treatment discontinuation and rates of opioid use.
Compared to patients testing negative for buprenorphine at intake, those testing positive (59.6%) had lower hazards of treatment discontinuation (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.60, p < 0.01). Results were little changed following adjustment for baseline opioid use and other patient characteristics (aHR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.70, p < 0.01). Risk of discontinuation did not significantly differ between patients by buprenorphine source: prescribed v. NPB (reference) at admission (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.46). Opioid use was lower in the buprenorphine positive group at admission (25.0% vs. 53.1%, p < 0.0001) and throughout early months of treatment but converged after 7 months for those remaining in care (17.1% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.89).
NPB preceding treatment intake was associated with decreased hazards of treatment discontinuation and lower opioid use. These findings suggest use of NPB may be a marker of treatment readiness and that buprenorphine testing at intake may have predictive value for clinical assessments regarding risk of early treatment discontinuation.
丁丙诺啡成功维持治疗可改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的治疗效果;然而,我们对治疗前使用非处方丁丙诺啡(NPB)与临床结局之间的关联知之甚少。
本研究对一个多州全国性的基于办公室的阿片类药物治疗项目的电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行了观察性回顾性分析。该研究观察了 1000 名新入院的 OUD 患者,他们在 2015 年至 2018 年期间接受丁丙诺啡维持治疗,并在摄入后长达 12 个月进行随访。我们通过强制性摄入药物检测和手动 EHR 编码来衡量 NPB 的使用情况。结局包括治疗中断的风险和阿片类药物使用的发生率。
与摄入时丁丙诺啡检测呈阴性的患者相比,检测呈阳性的患者(59.6%)治疗中断的风险较低(HR=0.52,95%CI:0.44,0.60,p<0.01)。在调整基线阿片类药物使用和其他患者特征后,结果变化不大(aHR:0.60,95%CI:0.51,0.70,p<0.01)。入院时丁丙诺啡来源(处方与 NPB)对患者的停药风险没有显著差异(HR=1.15,95%CI:0.90,1.46)。入院时,丁丙诺啡阳性组的阿片类药物使用量较低(25.0%比 53.1%,p<0.0001),并且在治疗早期的几个月内逐渐降低,但对于那些仍在接受治疗的患者,7 个月后趋于一致(17.1%比 16.5%,p=0.89)。
治疗前使用 NPB 与治疗中断风险降低和阿片类药物使用减少相关。这些发现表明,使用 NPB 可能是治疗准备的标志,并且摄入时进行丁丙诺啡检测可能对早期治疗中断风险的临床评估具有预测价值。