Suppr超能文献

滋补类中药注射剂治疗脓毒症或脓毒性休克的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析

Comparative Efficacy of Tonic Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Xiao Lu, Niu Liqing, Xu Xinyi, Zhao Yuetong, Yue Linkai, Liu Xinqiao, Li Guiwei

机构信息

Department of Emergency, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 15;13:830030. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.830030. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Sepsis has high mortality and is responsible for significant healthcare costs. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) have been widely used in China as a novel and promising treatment option for sepsis. Therefore, this study assessed and ranked the effectiveness of CHIs to provide more sights for the selection of sepsis treatment. Eight databases were searched from their inception up to September 1, 2021. The methodological quality of included study was evaluated by the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Then Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed by OpenBUGS 3.2.3 and STATA 14.0 software. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the examined treatments. Publication bias was reflected by a funnel plot. A total of 50 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 3,394 participants were identified for this analysis. Five CHIs including Shenfu injection, Shenmai injection, Shengmai injection, Shenqifuzheng injection, and Huangqi injection were included. The results of the NMA and sensitivity analysis showed that Shenqifuzheng (MD = -4.48, 95% CI = -5.59 to -3.24), Shenmai (MD = -3.38, 95% CI = -4.38 to -2.39), Shenfu (MD = -2.38, 95% CI = -3.03 to -1.70) and Shengmai (MD = -1.90, 95% CI = -3.47 to -0.31) combined with Western medicine (WM) had a superior effect in improving the APACHE II score. Based on SUCRA values, Shenqifuzheng injection (95.65%) ranked highest in the APACHE II score, followed by Shenmai (74%), Shenfu (47.1%), Shengmai (35.3%) and Huangqi injection (33.2%). Among the secondary outcomes, Shenmai injection was the most favorable intervention in reducing PCT and CRP levels, and Shenqifuzheng injection was the second favorable intervention in reducing CRP level. Shenfu injection combined with WM was more effective than the other treatments in decreasing the serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels and lowering the 28-days mortality. Regarding the improvement of immune function, Shenqifuzheng injections had obvious advantages. In conclusion, Shenqifuzheng injection was the optimum treatment regimen to improve APACHE II score, reduce CRP level, and regulate immune function. Shenfu injection was superior in reducing the expression of inflammatory factors and decreasing 28-days mortality. Nevertheless, more multicenter, diverse, and direct comparisons randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm the results. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=254531, identifier CRD42021254531.

摘要

脓毒症死亡率高,且产生了高昂的医疗费用。中药注射剂(CHIs)在中国已被广泛用作脓毒症一种新颖且有前景的治疗选择。因此,本研究对中药注射剂的有效性进行评估和排序,以便为脓毒症治疗方案的选择提供更多参考。检索了8个数据库,检索时间从建库至2021年9月1日。纳入研究的方法学质量采用随机试验的修订版Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。然后使用OpenBUGS 3.2.3和STATA 14.0软件进行贝叶斯网络meta分析。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率值用于对所研究的治疗方法进行排序。通过漏斗图反映发表偏倚。本分析共纳入50项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及3394名参与者。纳入了5种中药注射剂,包括参附注射液、参麦注射液、生脉注射液、参芪扶正注射液和黄芪注射液。网络meta分析和敏感性分析结果显示,参芪扶正(MD = -4.48,95%CI = -5.59至-3.24)、参麦(MD = -3.38,95%CI = -4.38至-2. 39)、参附(MD = -2.38,95%CI = -3.03至-1.70)和生脉(MD = -1.90,95%CI = -3.47至-0.31)联合西医(WM)在改善急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分方面具有更好的效果。基于SUCRA值,参芪扶正注射液(95.65%)在APACHE II评分中排名最高,其次是参麦(74%)、参附(47.1%)、生脉(35.3%)和黄芪注射液(33.2%)。在次要结局中,参麦注射液是降低降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平最有利的干预措施;参芪扶正注射液是降低CRP水平的第二有利干预措施。参附注射液联合西医在降低血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平以及降低28天死亡率方面比其他治疗更有效。在改善免疫功能方面,参芪扶正注射液具有明显优势。总之,参芪扶正注射液是改善APACHE II评分、降低CRP水平和调节免疫功能的最佳治疗方案。参附注射液在降低炎症因子表达和降低28天死亡率方面更具优势。然而,需要更多多中心、多样化和直接比较的随机对照试验来进一步证实这些结果。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=254531,标识符CRD42021254531

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bac0/8972587/58ee6dcfab86/fphar-13-830030-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验