Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):700-716. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12719. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
Recent evidence suggests that pre-school children with co-occurring phonological speech sound disorder (SSD) and expressive language difficulties are at a higher risk of ongoing communication and literacy needs in comparison with children with these difficulties in isolation. However, to date there has been no systematic or scoping review of the literature specific to interventions for children with this dual profile.
To explore the evidence regarding interventions for pre-school children with co-occurring phonological SSD and expressive language difficulties, including the content/delivery of such interventions, areas of speech and language targeted, and a broad overview of study quality.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: A scoping review methodology was used in accordance with the guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Following a systematic search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Emcare, OVID Embase, CINAHL, Psychinfo and ERIC, 11 studies were included in the review. A researcher-developed data extraction form was used to extract specific information about each intervention, with the JBI appraisal tools used to provide a broad overview of the quality of each study.
Included papers consisted of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two cohort studies, two case studies and one case series. Interventions fell into two main categories: (1) integrated interventions that combined content for both speech and language targets and/or explicitly used the same type of technique to improve both domains; and (2) single-domain interventions that explicitly included content to target speech or language only, but also aimed to improve the other domain indirectly. Study quality varied, with detail on the content, context and delivery of interventions often underspecified, hampering the replication and clinical applicability of findings.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Early emerging evidence was identified to support both integrated speech and language interventions as well as single-domain interventions. However, caution should be exercised due to the variation in the quality and level of detail reported for the interventions. Future intervention studies may seek to address this by reporting in accordance with Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting guidelines. This approach would enable clinicians to consider the applicability of the intervention to individual children within differing settings.
What is already known on the subject Pre-school children with co-occurring phonological SSD and expressive language difficulties frequently present within speech and language therapy services. These children are at a higher risk of long-term communication and literacy difficulties compared with children with these needs in isolation. Some emerging evidence suggests that interventions for children with this co-occurring profile may exist within the literature; however, this evidence may not be known to clinicians in everyday practice. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This review is the first to systematically examine evidence of interventions for pre-school children with co-occurring phonological SSD and expressive language difficulties. The review identified a small number of intervention studies that varied in research quality and level of detail provided regarding the content and delivery of interventions. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings of this study highlight published evidence for interventions for pre-school children with co-occurring phonological SSD and expressive language difficulties. These may take the form of integrating techniques for speech/language into a single intervention, or the explicit targeting of one domain with the aim of also influencing the other. However, there is a need for further high-quality research in this area. Such studies should provide sufficient detail to enable replication. This would enable clinicians to understand the relevance and applicability of such intervention findings to the individual children they see within their clinical practice.
最近的证据表明,与仅存在这些困难的儿童相比,同时患有语音言语障碍和表达性语言困难的学龄前儿童在持续的沟通和读写需求方面风险更高。然而,迄今为止,针对具有这种双重特征的儿童的干预措施,尚无系统或范围界定的文献综述。
探讨针对同时患有语音言语障碍和表达性语言困难的学龄前儿童的干预措施的证据,包括这些干预措施的内容/实施、针对的言语和语言领域,以及对研究质量的广泛概述。
根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指导,使用范围界定审查方法。在对 Ovid Medline、Ovid Emcare、OVID Embase、CINAHL、Psychinfo 和 ERIC 进行系统搜索后,有 11 项研究纳入了综述。研究人员开发的数据分析表格用于提取每个干预措施的具体信息,使用 JBI 评估工具提供对每个研究质量的广泛概述。
纳入的论文包括六项随机对照试验(RCT)、两项队列研究、两项案例研究和一项病例系列研究。干预措施分为两大类:(1)综合干预措施,将言语和语言目标的内容结合在一起,或明确使用相同类型的技术来改善两个领域;(2)单一领域干预措施,明确包括仅针对言语或语言的内容,但也旨在间接改善另一个领域。研究质量各不相同,干预措施的内容、背景和实施情况的详细信息往往不够详细,这阻碍了研究结果的复制和临床应用。
确定了早期出现的证据,支持综合言语和语言干预措施以及单一领域干预措施。然而,由于干预措施报告的质量和详细程度存在差异,因此应谨慎行事。未来的干预研究可能会试图通过遵循干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)报告指南来解决这个问题。这种方法将使临床医生能够考虑在不同环境下将干预措施应用于个别儿童。
同时患有语音言语障碍和表达性语言困难的学龄前儿童经常出现在言语和语言治疗服务中。与仅存在这些需求的儿童相比,这些儿童存在长期沟通和读写困难的风险更高。一些新出现的证据表明,文献中可能存在针对具有这种共同特征的儿童的干预措施;然而,这些证据可能不为日常实践中的临床医生所了解。
这是第一项系统检查针对同时患有语音言语障碍和表达性语言困难的学龄前儿童的干预措施的证据的综述。该综述确定了少数几项研究质量和提供的干预措施内容和实施情况详细程度各不相同的干预研究。
这方面的工作有哪些潜在或实际的临床意义?这项研究的结果突出了针对同时患有语音言语障碍和表达性语言困难的学龄前儿童的干预措施的已发表证据。这些措施可能采取将言语/语言技术整合到单个干预措施中的形式,或者明确针对一个领域,旨在对另一个领域也产生影响。然而,该领域仍需要进一步的高质量研究。这些研究应提供足够的详细信息,以实现复制。这将使临床医生能够理解这些干预措施对他们在临床实践中看到的个别儿童的相关性和适用性。