Suppr超能文献

半侧空间忽视中动机性显著刺激的优先化可能由目标相关性所支撑:一项元分析综述。

The prioritisation of motivationally salient stimuli in hemi-spatial neglect may be underpinned by goal-relevance: A meta-analytic review.

作者信息

Brown Chris R H

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Roehampton, Holybourne Avenue, Roehampton, London, UK.

出版信息

Cortex. 2022 May;150:85-107. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

Abstract

Damage to regions underpinning attention can result in hemi-spatial neglect, characterised by inattention to stimuli presented in contralesional space. Motivationally salient stimuli (e.g. reward/threat) are, however, resilient to neglect and more likely to be detected compared to neutral stimuli. Prominent theories of attention suggest that the motivational detection advantage in neglect is underpinned by a goal-independent 'emotional attention' system. However, measures of stimulus awareness previously used often present the stimuli as part of the goal-relevant target set. Previous findings may therefore be more consistent with top-down attentional selection, which is preserved in some cases of neglect. Using multilevel and Bayesian meta-analytic approaches to individual case and group data, the evidence for a motivational detection advantage in neglect, and conditions when it emerges, were examined and conceptual claims reviewed. Cumulative evidence suggested that in perceptually simple conditions, when a single stimulus appeared, there was no evidence of a motivational detection advantage (Individual: k = 36; log OR = .02, 95%CI [-.44,.47]; Group: k = 2, d = .24, 95%CI [-.26, .74]). Conversely, under more perceptually demanding conditions, with multiple goal-relevant stimuli, motivationally salient stimuli were detected more than neutral stimuli in the contralesion side of space (Individual: k = 37, log OR = 1.04, 95%CI [.74, 1.34]; Group: k = 7, d = .81, 95%CI [.27, 1.35]). Across investigations the detection advantage occurred when the motivationally salient stimulus was a target, and under perceptually demanding conditions when goal-irrelevant motivationally salient stimuli are usually suppressed. The current evidence therefore does not strongly support a goal-independent mechanism, and a top-down account remains plausible. This account can be contextualised within existing models of neglect, whereby perceptual load induces suppression of contralesional space when ipsilesional space is prioritised. Target stimuli may, however, still be detected under reduced perceptual capacity due to their goal-relevance, which may be selectively enhanced by motivational salience.

摘要

对支撑注意力的脑区造成损伤可能会导致半侧空间忽视,其特征是对患侧空间呈现的刺激缺乏关注。然而,与中性刺激相比,具有动机显著性的刺激(如奖励/威胁)对忽视具有抵抗力,更有可能被检测到。著名的注意力理论表明,忽视中的动机检测优势是由一个与目标无关的“情绪注意力”系统支撑的。然而,先前使用的刺激意识测量方法通常将刺激作为与目标相关的目标集的一部分呈现。因此,先前的研究结果可能更符合自上而下的注意力选择,而这种选择在某些忽视案例中是保留的。使用针对个体病例和群体数据的多层次和贝叶斯元分析方法,研究了忽视中动机检测优势的证据以及其出现的条件,并对概念性主张进行了回顾。累积证据表明,在感知简单的条件下,当单个刺激出现时,没有动机检测优势的证据(个体:k = 36;对数优势比 = 0.02,95%置信区间[−0.44, 0.47];群体:k = 2,d = 0.24,95%置信区间[−0.26, 0.74])。相反,在感知要求更高的条件下,当存在多个与目标相关的刺激时,在空间的患侧,具有动机显著性的刺激比中性刺激更容易被检测到(个体:k = 37,对数优势比 = 1.04,95%置信区间[0.74, 1.34];群体:k = 7,d = 0.81,95%置信区间[0.27, 1.35])。在各项研究中,当具有动机显著性的刺激是目标时,以及在感知要求较高的条件下,当与目标无关的具有动机显著性的刺激通常被抑制时,检测优势就会出现。因此,目前的证据并不强烈支持一种与目标无关的机制,自上而下的解释仍然合理。这种解释可以在现有的忽视模型中进行情境化,即在优先考虑同侧空间时,感知负荷会导致对患侧空间的抑制。然而,由于目标相关性,目标刺激在感知能力降低的情况下可能仍然会被检测到,而动机显著性可能会选择性地增强这种检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验