Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Šibenik-Knin County, Stjepana Radića 83, 22000, Šibenik, Croatia.
Department of Internal Medicine, "Dr. Josip Benčević" General Hospital, Slavonski Brod, Croatia.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Jun;134(11-12):483-486. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02027-w. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
Discriminating polycythemia vera (PV) from secondary polycythemia (SP) is crucial due to the inherent risk of thrombosis in PV and different treatment approaches. The majority of PV patients have subnormal serum erythropoietin levels and harbor Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) mutations; however, serum erythropoietin levels may be normal in approximately one third of PV patients and mutational analysis is costly and requires access to specialized laboratories. Recently, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLR) emerged as rapidly available biomarkers to identify PV patients under an increased risk of thrombosis and death. This multicenter retrospective study investigated whether these two biomarkers may also be used to differentiate PV from SP. A total of 207 subjects were included (103 PV and 104 SP) with both baseline NLR (median 4.33 vs. 1.89) and PLR (median 259.12 vs. 81.11) being significantly higher in PV than in SP (p < 0.001 for both analyses). According to the receiver operating curve analysis, PLR (area under the curve, AUC 0.936, the optimal cut-off value of > 138.1 had 82.5% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity for the detection of PV) outperformed other tested variables (NLR, total leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets) and its cut-off values with 100% specificity and sensitivity were able to confirm (PLR > 224.56; 31% patients) and to exclude (PLR < 68.8; 13% patients) the highest proportions of PV patients. Therefore, PLR may represent a cheap and a rapidly available biomarker with valuable diagnostic and prognostic properties. This information may be particularly useful in resource-limited settings; however, our results need validation on larger datasets.
鉴别真性红细胞增多症 (PV) 和继发性红细胞增多症 (SP) 至关重要,因为 PV 存在血栓形成的固有风险,且治疗方法也不同。大多数 PV 患者的血清促红细胞生成素水平降低且存在 JAK2 突变;然而,约三分之一的 PV 患者的血清促红细胞生成素水平可能正常,且突变分析费用昂贵,并且需要进入专门的实验室。最近,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞 (NLR) 和血小板与淋巴细胞 (PLR) 比值已成为快速可用的生物标志物,可识别处于血栓形成和死亡风险增加的 PV 患者。这项多中心回顾性研究探讨了这两种生物标志物是否也可用于区分 PV 和 SP。共纳入 207 例患者(103 例 PV 和 104 例 SP),PV 患者的基线 NLR(中位数为 4.33)和 PLR(中位数为 259.12)均明显高于 SP(两项分析均 p<0.001)。根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,PLR(曲线下面积,AUC 为 0.936,最佳截断值>138.1 对 PV 的检测具有 82.5%的敏感性和 91.67%的特异性)优于其他测试变量(NLR、总白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和血小板),其截断值具有 100%的特异性和敏感性,能够确认(PLR>224.56;31%的患者)和排除(PLR<68.8;13%的患者)最高比例的 PV 患者。因此,PLR 可能是一种具有诊断和预后价值的廉价、快速可用的生物标志物。该信息在资源有限的情况下可能特别有用;然而,我们的结果需要在更大的数据集上进行验证。