Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07861-2.
Patients are important stakeholders in reducing low-value care, yet mechanisms for optimizing their involvement in low-value care remain unclear. To explore the role of patients in the development and implementation of Choosing Wisely recommendations to reduce low-value care and to assess the likelihood that existing patient resources will change patient health behaviour.
Three phased mixed-methods study: 1) content analysis of all publicly available Choosing Wisely clinician lists and patient resources from the United States of America and Canada. Quantitative data was summarized with frequencies and free text comments were analyzed with qualitative thematic content analysis; 2) semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of representatives of professional societies who created Choosing Wisely clinician lists and members of the public (including patients and family members). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and two researchers conducted qualitative template analysis; 3) evaluation of Choosing Wisely patient resources. Two public partners were identified through the Calgary Critical Care Research Network and independently answered two free text questions "would this change your health behaviour" and "would you discuss this material with a healthcare provider". Free text data was analyzed by two researchers using thematic content analysis.
From the content analysis of 136 Choosing Wisely clinician lists, six reported patient involvement in their development. From 148 patient resource documents that were mapped onto a conceptual framework (Inform, Activate, Collaborate) 64% described patient engagement at the level of Inform (educating patients). From 19 interviews stakeholder perceptions of patient involvement in reducing low-value care were captured by four themes: 1) impact of perceived power dynamics on the discussion of low-value care in the clinical interaction, 2) how to communicate about low-value care, 3) perceived barriers to patient involvement in reducing low-value care, and 4) suggested strategies to engage patients and families in Choosing Wisely initiatives. In the final phase of work in response to the question "would this change your health behaviour" two patient partners agreed 'yes' on 27% of patient resources.
Opportunities exist to increase patient and family participation in initiatives to reduce low-value care.
患者是减少低价值医疗的重要利益相关者,但优化患者参与低价值医疗的机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨患者在制定和实施“明智选择”(Choosing Wisely)建议以减少低价值医疗中的作用,并评估现有患者资源是否有可能改变患者的健康行为。
这是一项三阶段混合方法研究:1)对美国和加拿大所有公开的“明智选择”临床医生清单和患者资源进行内容分析。对定量数据进行了频率总结,对自由文本评论进行了定性主题内容分析;2)对制定“明智选择”临床医生清单的专业协会代表和公众(包括患者和家属)进行半结构式电话访谈。访谈内容逐字记录,由两名研究人员进行定性模板分析;3)评估“明智选择”患者资源。通过卡尔加里危重病研究网络确定了两名公众合作伙伴,他们独立回答了两个自由文本问题,“这会改变你的健康行为吗”和“你会与医疗保健提供者讨论这些材料吗”。两名研究人员使用主题内容分析对自由文本数据进行了分析。
从对 136 份“明智选择”临床医生清单的内容分析中,有 6 份报告了患者在清单制定过程中的参与情况。在与概念框架(告知、激活、合作)相匹配的 148 份患者资源文件中,64%的文件描述了告知层面的患者参与(教育患者)。从 19 次访谈中,我们获得了利益相关者对患者在减少低价值医疗中的参与的看法,这四个主题包括:1)在临床互动中,感知到的权力动态对低价值医疗讨论的影响;2)如何就低价值医疗进行沟通;3)患者参与减少低价值医疗的感知障碍;4)吸引患者和家属参与“明智选择”倡议的建议策略。在工作的最后阶段,针对“这会改变你的健康行为吗”这个问题,两名患者合作伙伴在 27%的患者资源上表示“是”。
为了增加患者和家属参与减少低价值医疗的机会,我们需要采取相应的措施。