Drug Discovery Biology, Neuroscience & Mental Health Therapeutic Program Area, and Neuromedicines Discovery Centre, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash Biomedical Imaging, and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):147. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01904-2.
Despite 50+ years of drug discovery, current antipsychotics have limited efficacy against negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, and are ineffective-with the exception of clozapine-against any symptom domain for patients who are treatment resistant. Novel therapeutics with diverse non-dopamine D receptor targets have been explored extensively in clinical trials, yet often fail due to a lack of efficacy despite showing promise in preclinical development. This lack of translation between preclinical and clinical efficacy suggests a systematic failure in current methods that determine efficacy in preclinical rodent models. In this review, we critically evaluate rodent models and behavioural tests used to determine preclinical efficacy, and look to clinical research to provide a roadmap for developing improved translational measures. We highlight the dependence of preclinical models and tests on dopamine-centric theories of dysfunction and how this has contributed towards a self-reinforcing loop away from clinically meaningful predictions of efficacy. We review recent clinical findings of distinct dopamine-mediated dysfunction of corticostriatal circuits in patients with treatment-resistant vs. non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia and suggest criteria for establishing rodent models to reflect such differences, with a focus on objective, translational measures. Finally, we review current schizophrenia drug discovery and propose a framework where preclinical models are validated against objective, clinically informed measures and preclinical tests of efficacy map onto those used clinically.
尽管经过了 50 多年的药物研发,但目前的抗精神病药物在治疗精神分裂症的阴性和认知症状方面疗效有限,除氯氮平外,对治疗抵抗的患者的任何症状领域都没有效果。具有不同非多巴胺 D 受体靶点的新型疗法已在临床试验中广泛探索,但由于缺乏疗效而经常失败,尽管在临床前开发中显示出前景。这种临床前疗效和临床疗效之间缺乏转化表明,目前在确定临床前啮齿动物模型疗效的方法中存在系统性失败。在这篇综述中,我们批判性地评估了用于确定临床前疗效的啮齿动物模型和行为测试,并参考临床研究为开发改进的转化措施提供了路线图。我们强调了临床前模型和测试对以多巴胺为中心的功能障碍理论的依赖性,以及这如何导致远离对疗效有临床意义的预测的自我强化循环。我们回顾了最近关于皮质纹状体回路中多巴胺介导的功能障碍在治疗抵抗和非治疗抵抗精神分裂症患者中的不同的临床发现,并提出了建立反映这些差异的啮齿动物模型的标准,重点是客观的、转化的措施。最后,我们回顾了目前的精神分裂症药物发现,并提出了一个框架,其中临床前模型根据客观的、基于临床的措施进行验证,临床前的疗效测试与临床中使用的测试相匹配。