University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway.
Bayes Business School, City, University of London, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114911. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Vaccines save lives. Despite the undisputed value of vaccination, vaccine hesitancy continues to be a major global challenge, particularly throughout the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since vaccination decisions are counter-intuitive and cognitively demanding, we propose that vaccine hesitancy is associated with executive function-a group of high-level cognitive skills including attentional control, working memory, inhibition, self-regulation, cognitive flexibility, and strategic planning.
We set out to test (i) whether vaccine hesitancy is driven by individual differences in executive function beyond established socio-demographic factors (e.g., education, political orientation, gender, ethnicity, age, religiosity) and depressed mood, and (ii) whether this relationship is exacerbated by situational stress.
Two studies were conducted with U.S. residents. Using a cross-sectional design, Study 1 examined the associations between executive function, socio-demographic factors, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Using an experimental design, Study 2 focused solely on unvaccinated individuals and tested the interactive effect of executive function and stress on willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the data.
Individual differences in executive function predicted participants' COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in health authorities, and their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Importantly, the unique contribution of executive function to vaccine hesitancy could not be explained by socio-demographic factors or depressed mood. Furthermore, Study 2 revealed that weaker executive function had detrimental effects on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and trust in health authorities mainly under heightened stress.
Individual differences in executive function and situational stress jointly impact COVID-19 vaccination decisions and need to be considered together when designing health communications aimed at reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Interventions that lower stress and promote trust have the potential to increase vaccine acceptance, especially for individuals with weaker executive function.
疫苗拯救生命。尽管疫苗接种的价值无可争议,但疫苗犹豫仍然是一个主要的全球挑战,尤其是在 COVID-19 全球大流行期间。由于疫苗接种决策具有反直觉和认知要求高的特点,我们提出疫苗犹豫与执行功能有关——一组高级认知技能,包括注意力控制、工作记忆、抑制、自我调节、认知灵活性和战略规划。
我们旨在测试(i)疫苗犹豫是否是由执行功能的个体差异驱动的,而不仅仅是既定的社会人口因素(例如,教育、政治取向、性别、种族、年龄、宗教信仰)和抑郁情绪,以及(ii)这种关系是否因情境压力而加剧。
两项研究在美国居民中进行。使用横断面设计,研究 1 检验了执行功能、社会人口因素、COVID-19 阴谋信念、对卫生当局的信任与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫之间的关联。使用实验设计,研究 2 仅关注未接种疫苗的个体,并测试了执行功能和压力对接受 COVID-19 疫苗意愿的交互作用。我们使用有序逻辑回归分析数据。
执行功能的个体差异预测了参与者的 COVID-19 阴谋信念、对卫生当局的信任以及他们接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿。重要的是,执行功能对疫苗犹豫的独特贡献不能用社会人口因素或抑郁情绪来解释。此外,研究 2 表明,较弱的执行功能对 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受度和对卫生当局的信任产生了不利影响,主要是在压力加剧的情况下。
执行功能的个体差异和情境压力共同影响 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策,在设计旨在降低 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的健康传播时需要一起考虑。降低压力和促进信任的干预措施有可能增加疫苗接种率,特别是对执行功能较弱的个体。