Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜髂内动脉临时阻断联合子宫修复术并宫腔镜吸宫术在Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的应用

Application of laparoscopic internal iliac artery temporary occlusion and uterine repair combined with hysteroscopic aspiration in type III cesarean scar pregnancy.

作者信息

Su Xianghui, Yang Miner, Na Zhao, Wen Canliang, Liu Meiling, Cai Chunfang, Zhong Zhuohui, Zhou Bingqian, Tang Xiang

机构信息

Department of Minimal Invasive Gynecology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2022 Mar 15;14(3):1737-1741. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic internal iliac artery temporary occlusion and uterine repair combined with hysteroscopic aspiration in type III cesarean scar pregnancy. 135 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy in Guangzhou Women and Children's Hospital from November 2017 to November 2020 were collected and 32 cases of type III patients were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into internal iliac artery temporary occlusion (IIATO) group (21 cases), and bilateral uterine artery embolization (UAE) group (11 cases). The general condition, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and prognosis of the two groups were analyzed. In the IIATO group, the bilateral internal iliac arteries were temporarily blocked with No. 10 silk thread under laparoscopy. The scar pregnancy clearance and repair of the scar were performed after incision. Subsequently, we performed hysteroscopic aspiration. After the operation, the internal iliac artery ligation thread was removed. In the UAE group, the patients were treated with bilateral uterine artery embolization. Laparoscopic uterine scar repair and hysteroscopy aspiration were performed within 24 hours after embolization. There was no significant difference in age, times of pregnancy, times of cesarean section and gestational weeks between the two groups (>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the diameter of gestational sac or gestational mass and serum human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level between the two groups before operation (>0.05). The operations were successfully completed in 32 patients, and intraoperative blood loss was 67.14±32.78 ml and 71.35±31.56 ml, respectively (<0.05). The length of hospital stay was 5.14±0.32 day and 4.97±0.21 day, respectively. No peri-procedural bleeding occurred and no secondary surgeries were required. Laparoscopic internal iliac artery temporary occlusion and uterine repair combined with hysteroscopic aspiration is an effective and safe treatment for type III cesarean scar pregnancy, with less postoperative complications and better protection of fertility function for patients.

摘要

探讨腹腔镜下髂内动脉临时阻断联合子宫修复术并宫腔镜吸宫术治疗Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效及安全性。收集2017年11月至2020年11月在广州市妇女儿童医疗中心收治的135例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者,回顾性分析其中32例Ⅲ型患者的临床资料。将其分为髂内动脉临时阻断(IIATO)组(21例)和双侧子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)组(11例)。分析两组患者的一般情况、术中出血量、术后并发症及预后情况。IIATO组在腹腔镜下用10号丝线临时阻断双侧髂内动脉,切开子宫后清除瘢痕妊娠物并修复瘢痕,随后行宫腔镜吸宫术,术后取出髂内动脉结扎线。UAE组采用双侧子宫动脉栓塞术治疗,栓塞术后24小时内行腹腔镜子宫瘢痕修复及宫腔镜吸宫术。两组患者年龄、妊娠次数、剖宫产次数及孕周比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05);术前两组患者孕囊或妊娠包块直径及血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。32例患者手术均顺利完成,两组术中出血量分别为(67.14±32.78)ml和(71.35±31.56)ml,差异有统计学意义(<0.05);住院时间分别为(5.14±0.32)天和(4.97±0.21)天。两组患者围手术期均未发生大出血,均无需二次手术。腹腔镜下髂内动脉临时阻断联合子宫修复术并宫腔镜吸宫术治疗Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠疗效确切、安全,术后并发症少,对患者生育功能保护较好。

相似文献

4
[Clinical analysis on hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 25;52(10):669-674. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.10.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporary uterine artery blocking and uterine artery embolization in treating cesarean scar pregnancy.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Jul 31;19(3):377-383. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17890. eCollection 2024 Oct 16.
2
Clinical study of two reversible arterial blockade methods in the treatment of scar pregnancy under combined hysterolaparoscopy.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):6770-6778. doi: 10.62347/UOBH1544. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical Application of a New Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Classification and Evaluation System and a Risk Scoring System.
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 16;17:115-126. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S445327. eCollection 2024.
5
Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Sep 13;15:7229-7240. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S369884. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:682368. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682368. eCollection 2021.
2
Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy according to gestational age at diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Mar;258:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
Controversies in family planning: Management of cesarean-scar ectopic pregnancy.
Contraception. 2021 Mar;103(3):208-212. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.
Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 3.
6
Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;246:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):B2-B14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验