Suppr超能文献

[远程工作:新冠疫情之前及期间的数据与证据]

[Telework: Data and evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic].

作者信息

Benavides Fernando, Silva-Peñaherrera Michael

机构信息

Centro de Investigación en Salud Laboral, UPF-IMIM/PSMar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2022 Apr 15;25(2):133-146. doi: 10.12961/aprl.2022.25.02.06.

Abstract

This short essay starts from the hypothesis that teleworking is nothing more, and nothing less, than the manifestation of an announced change of time, of which the pandemic is acting as an accelerator. A change of era defined by a new economic and labor space that is cyberspace, which deepens the digitization of the economy and the flexibilization of the labor market. Teleworking is an expected result in this new reality. The pandemic has exponentially increased this new form of work organization, defined as work done at home using electronic equipment. From a global perspective, the ILO has estimated, based on household surveys of 31 countries carried out in the second quarter of 2020, that 17.4% of the employed people worldwide, some 557 million, worked in that sector. period in their homes, ranging from 25.4% in high-income countries to 13.6% in low-income countries. For Latin America, teleworking rose between 25-30% in the second quarter of 2020, and in Europe, Eurofound, in April 2020, estimated that 37% of participants had started working at home with the onset of the pandemic. All of which has made it possible to maintain certain economic activity and the employment relationship of these people during the pandemic. Likewise, it should not be forgotten that the pandemic has also caused huge job losses, especially during the second quarter of 2020, when, according to ILO estimates, more than 300 million full-time jobs were lost. Job losses that as of the 2nd quarter of 2021 have not yet recovered from pre-pandemic levels. In this sense, it should not be forgotten that teleworking does not create new occupations, it only provides a new way of organizing work for those occupations whose tasks can be performed virtually. At the time of writing this article, after a year of restrictions on economic activity, mobility and social interaction, the surveys that Eurofound has continued to carry out show that exclusive teleworking, every day of the week, is decreasing in the whole of the European Union, from 34% in summer 2020 (second round) to 24% in spring 2021 (third round). Given that the pandemic has not yet ended, and we do not know how the "experiment" will end, we must continue to monitor these changes in the way of working, and how they affect the labor market and employment and working conditions. As far as we know, teleworking offers great advantages, but also important disadvantages, with respect to working and employment conditions, which can, positively or negatively, affect the health of the teleworker. Telework regulation is a key element of cyberspace-based regulation of the digital economy, and it must be a global issue.

摘要

这篇短文始于这样一个假设

远程办公不过是已宣布的时间变革的一种表现,而疫情正充当着这种变革的加速器。这是一个由新的经济和劳动空间——网络空间所定义的时代变革,它加深了经济的数字化以及劳动力市场的灵活性。远程办公是这一新现实中的一个预期结果。疫情使这种新的工作组织形式呈指数级增长,这种形式被定义为使用电子设备在家中完成的工作。从全球角度来看,国际劳工组织根据2020年第二季度对31个国家进行的家庭调查估计,全球17.4%的就业人员,约5.57亿人,在那段时期在家中工作,这一比例在高收入国家为25.4%,在低收入国家为13.6%。就拉丁美洲而言,2020年第二季度远程办公人数增长了25%至30%,在欧洲,欧洲改善生活和工作条件基金会在2020年4月估计,37%的参与者在疫情开始时就已开始在家工作。所有这些使得在疫情期间能够维持一定的经济活动以及这些人的就业关系。同样,不应忘记的是,疫情也导致了大量失业,尤其是在2020年第二季度,据国际劳工组织估计,当时有超过3亿个全职工作岗位流失。截至2021年第二季度,失业情况仍未恢复到疫情前的水平。从这个意义上说,不应忘记远程办公并不会创造新的职业,它只是为那些任务可以虚拟执行的职业提供了一种新的工作组织方式。在撰写本文时,在对经济活动、流动性和社会互动进行了一年的限制之后,欧洲改善生活和工作条件基金会持续开展的调查显示,在整个欧盟,每周每天都进行独家远程办公的情况正在减少,从2020年夏季的34%(第二轮)降至2021年春季的24%(第三轮)。鉴于疫情尚未结束,而且我们也不知道这场“试验”将如何收场,我们必须继续监测工作方式的这些变化,以及它们如何影响劳动力市场、就业和工作条件。就我们所知,远程办公在工作和就业条件方面既有很大优势,也有重要劣势,这可能对远程工作者的健康产生积极或消极的影响。远程办公监管是基于网络空间的数字经济监管的关键要素,而且它必须是一个全球性问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验