Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Department of Head and Neck Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3065-3076. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01926. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy.
In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in all patients. The key secondary end point was OS in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥ 10%.
In total, 512 patients across 11 countries/regions were randomly assigned. At final analysis, conducted after 410 death events occurred, OS was significantly longer with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in all patients (median, 8.6 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85]; one-sided = .0001), and in patients with TAP ≥ 10% (median, 10.3 months 6.8 months; HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79]; one-sided = .0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across all predefined subgroups, including those defined by baseline TAP score, region, and race. Treatment with tislelizumab was associated with higher objective response rate (20.3% 9.8%) and a more durable antitumor response (median, 7.1 months 4.0 months) versus chemotherapy in all patients. Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (18.8% 55.8%) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.
Tislelizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 TAP ≥ 10% also demonstrated statistically significant survival benefit with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.
晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者预后较差。对于这些患者,一线系统治疗后治疗选择有限。
在这项开放标签的 III 期临床研究中,接受过一线系统治疗后疾病进展的晚期或转移性 ESCC 患者被随机分配(1:1)接受静脉注射替雷利珠单抗,一种抗程序性死亡蛋白 1 抗体,每 3 周 200mg 或化疗(研究者选择紫杉醇、多西他赛或伊立替康)。主要终点是所有患者的总生存期(OS)。关键次要终点是程序性死亡配体 1 肿瘤面积阳性(TAP)评分≥10%的患者的 OS。
共有来自 11 个国家/地区的 512 名患者被随机分配。在最终分析中,在发生 410 例死亡事件后进行,与化疗相比,替雷利珠单抗在所有患者(中位 OS:8.6 6.3 个月;HR:0.70 [95%CI:0.57 至 0.85];单侧 =.0001)和 TAP≥10%的患者(中位 OS:10.3 6.8 个月;HR:0.54 [95%CI:0.36 至 0.79];单侧 =.0006)中的 OS 显著延长。在所有预先定义的亚组中均观察到生存获益,包括 TAP 基线评分、地区和种族定义的亚组。与化疗相比,替雷利珠单抗治疗在所有患者中具有更高的客观缓解率(20.3% 9.8%)和更持久的抗肿瘤反应(中位缓解持续时间:7.1 个月 4.0 个月)。替雷利珠单抗治疗的患者发生≥3 级治疗相关不良事件的比例(18.8% 55.8%)低于化疗。
与化疗相比,替雷利珠单抗作为晚期或转移性 ESCC 二线治疗显著改善了 OS,安全性可耐受。TAP≥10%的患者也观察到替雷利珠单抗与化疗相比具有统计学显著的生存获益。