Waasdorp Tracy Evian, Fu Rui, Clary Laura K, Bradshaw Catherine P
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Center for Violence Prevention. 3402 Civic Center Blvd. Philadelphia, PA 19104.
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Department of Psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA 19104.
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;80. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Bullying bystanders' reactions are important for either stopping or perpetuating bullying behaviors. Given school-based bullying programs' focus on bystanders, understanding the associations between school-level factors and individual bystander responses can improve intervention efficacy. Data from 64,670 adolescents were used to examine bullying bystander responses as a function of 13 school-climate dimensions within 3 main factors (Engagement, Environment, Safety) and individual-level factors (e.g., race/ethnicity, perceptions of student-teacher connectedness). Multi-level models showed schools with better Engagement and Safety had higher odds of defender behaviors, a better Environment was associated with lower odds of passive and assisting behaviors. Differences also varied by individual-level factors. For example, an aggressive climate was associated with passive behaviors more strongly in boys and high schoolers. Further, higher perceived parent-teacher and student-teacher connectedness were associated with positive bystander behaviors, and this was stronger for Black and Latinx youth, highlighting the importance of improving relationships as a crucial starting point.
欺凌旁观者的反应对于制止或延续欺凌行为至关重要。鉴于以学校为基础的欺凌预防项目侧重于旁观者,了解学校层面因素与个体旁观者反应之间的关联可以提高干预效果。研究使用了来自64670名青少年的数据,以检验欺凌旁观者的反应如何作为3个主要因素(参与度、环境、安全)中的13个学校氛围维度以及个体层面因素(如种族/民族、师生联系感)的函数。多层次模型显示,参与度和安全状况较好的学校出现捍卫行为的几率更高,较好的环境与被动行为和协助行为的较低几率相关。差异也因个体层面因素而有所不同。例如,在男孩和高中生中,攻击性氛围与被动行为的关联更为强烈。此外,较高的家长-教师和师生联系感与积极的旁观者行为相关,对于黑人和拉丁裔青少年而言这种关联更强,这凸显了改善关系作为关键起点的重要性。