Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Int J Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;67:1604542. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604542. eCollection 2022.
Since the WHO's "Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Plan" in 1999, pandemic preparedness plans at the international and national level have been constantly adapted with the common goal to respond early to outbreaks, identify risks, and outline promising interventions for pandemic containment. Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, public health experts have started to reflect on the extent to which previous preparations have been helpful as well as on the gaps in pandemic preparedness planning. In the present commentary, we advocate for the inclusion of social and ethical factors in future pandemic planning-factors that have been insufficiently considered so far, although social determinants of infection risk and infectious disease severity contribute to aggravated social inequalities in health.
自 1999 年世界卫生组织(WHO)的“流感大流行防范计划”以来,国际和国家层面的大流行防范计划一直在不断调整,共同目标是及早应对疫情爆发、识别风险,并为大流行控制制定有前景的干预措施。在 COVID-19 大流行两年后,公共卫生专家开始反思以前的准备工作在多大程度上有所帮助,以及大流行防范规划中的差距。在本评论中,我们主张在未来的大流行规划中纳入社会和伦理因素——尽管传染病风险的社会决定因素和传染病严重程度导致健康方面的社会不平等加剧,但这些因素迄今尚未得到充分考虑。