Liao Siyan, Pino Michael James, Deleon Catherine, Lindner-Jackson Maurice, Wu Chun
Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA.
Life Sci. 2022 Jul 1;300:120553. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120553. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) plays a critical role in regulating monoaminergic activity. EPPTB is the only known selective potent antagonist of the mouse (m) TAAR1 presently, while it was shown to be weak at antagonizing human (h) TAAR1. The lack of high-resolution structure of TAAR1 hinders the understanding of the differences in the interaction modes between EPPTB and m/hTARR1. The purpose of this study is to probe these interaction modes using homology modeling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and molecular mechanics-generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) binding energy calculations. Eight populated conformers of hTAAR1-EPPTB complex were observed during the MD simulations and could be used in structure-based virtual screening in future. The MM-GBSA binding energy of hTAAR1-EPPTB complex (-96.5 kcal/mol) is larger than that of mTAAR1-EPPTB complex (-106.7 kcal/mol), which is consistent with the experimental finding that EPPTB has weaker binding affinity to hTAAR1. The several residues in binding site of hTAAR1 (F154, T194 and I290) are different from these of mTAAR1 (Y153, A193 and Y287), which might contribute to the binding affinity difference. Our docking analysis on another hTAAR1 antagonist Compound 3 has found that: 1). this compound binds in different pockets of our mTAAR1 and hTAAR1 homology models with a slightly stronger binding affinity to hTAAR1; 2). both antagonists bind to a very similar pocket of hTAAR1.
痕量胺相关受体1(TAAR1)在调节单胺能活性中起关键作用。EPPTB是目前已知的唯一对小鼠(m)TAAR1有选择性的强效拮抗剂,而它对人(h)TAAR1的拮抗作用较弱。TAAR1缺乏高分辨率结构阻碍了对EPPTB与m/hTAAR1相互作用模式差异的理解。本研究的目的是使用同源建模、分子对接、分子动力学(MD)模拟和分子力学-广义玻恩表面积(MM-GBSA)结合能计算来探究这些相互作用模式。在MD模拟过程中观察到hTAAR1-EPPTB复合物的8种优势构象,未来可用于基于结构的虚拟筛选。hTAAR1-EPPTB复合物的MM-GBSA结合能(-96.5 kcal/mol)大于mTAAR1-EPPTB复合物的(-106.7 kcal/mol),这与EPPTB对hTAAR1的结合亲和力较弱的实验结果一致。hTAAR1结合位点中的几个残基(F154、T194和I290)与mTAAR1的不同(Y153、A193和Y287),这可能导致了结合亲和力的差异。我们对另一种hTAAR1拮抗剂化合物3的对接分析发现:1). 该化合物在我们的mTAAR1和hTAAR1同源模型的不同口袋中结合,对hTAAR1的结合亲和力略强;2). 两种拮抗剂都结合在hTAAR1的一个非常相似的口袋中。