Fischer Johannes, Halbig Josefine, Augdal Thomas, Angenete Oskar, Stoustrup Peter Bangsgaard, Dahl Kristensen Kasper, Skeie Marit Slåttelid, Tylleskär Karin, Rosén Annika, Shi Xieqi, Rosendahl Karen
Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Public Dental Service Competence Centre of Northern-Norway (TkNN), Tromsø, Norway.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;51(6):20210478. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210478. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
To examine the precision of imaging measures commonly used to assess mandibular morphology in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Secondly, to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the measurement of condylar height.
Those included were children diagnosed with JIA during 2015-18 who had had an MRI, a CBCT of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and a lateral cephalogram (ceph) of the head within one month of each other. Agreement within and between observers and methods was examined using Bland-Altman mean-difference plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA). A 95% LOA within 15% of the sample mean was considered acceptable. Minimal detectable change (MDC) within and between observers was estimated.
90 patients (33 males) were included, with a mean age of 12.8 years. For MRI, intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were relatively narrow for total mandibular length: 9.6% of the sample mean. For CBCT, condylar height, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were wide: 16.0 and 28.4% of the sample mean, respectively. For ceph, both intra- and interobserver 95% LOA were narrow for the SNA-angle and gonion angle: 5.9 and 8% of the sample mean, and 6.2 and 6.8%, respectively.
We have identified a set of precise measurements for facial morphology assessments in JIA, including one MRI-based (total mandibular length), one CBCT-based (condylar height), and three ceph-based. Condylar height was higher for MRI than for CBCT; however, the measurement was too imprecise for clinical use. MDC was also determined for a series of measurements.
研究常用于评估幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)儿童和青少年下颌形态的影像学测量方法的精度。其次,比较锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在髁突高度测量中的差异。
纳入2015年至2018年期间诊断为JIA的儿童,这些儿童在彼此相隔一个月内接受了MRI、颞下颌关节(TMJ)的CBCT以及头部的侧位头影测量(ceph)。使用Bland-Altman平均差异图和95%一致性界限(LOA)来检查观察者之间以及方法之间的一致性。样本均值的15%以内的95%LOA被认为是可接受的。估计了观察者内部和观察者之间的最小可检测变化(MDC)。
纳入90例患者(33例男性),平均年龄12.8岁。对于MRI,观察者内部和观察者之间的95%LOA在下颌总长度方面相对较窄:为样本均值的9.6%。对于CBCT,髁突高度的观察者内部和观察者之间的95%LOA都较宽:分别为样本均值的16.0%和28.4%。对于ceph,SNA角和下颌角的观察者内部和观察者之间的95%LOA都较窄:分别为样本均值的5.9%和8%,以及6.2%和6.8%。
我们确定了一组用于JIA面部形态评估的精确测量方法,包括一种基于MRI的(下颌总长度)、一种基于CBCT的(髁突高度)和三种基于ceph的。MRI测量的髁突高度高于CBCT;然而,该测量精度太低,无法用于临床。还确定了一系列测量的MDC。