Ferreira Ana Rita, Gonçalves-Pinho Manuel, Simões Mário R, Freitas Alberto, Fernandes Lia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Feb;27(2):380-388. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2065663. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
To characterize all hospitalizations held in mainland Portugal (2010-2015) with dementia-related agitation based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding, and to investigate whether there is a relationship between agitation and hospitalization outcomes.
A retrospective observational study was conducted using an administrative dataset containing data from all mainland Portuguese public hospitals. Only hospitalization episodes for patients aged over 65 years who have received a dementia diagnosis ascertained by an ICD-9-CM code of dementia with behavioral disturbance (294.11 and 294.21) and dementia without behavioral disturbance (294.10 and 294.20) were selected. Episodes were further grouped according to the presence of an agitation code. For each episode, demographic data and hospitalization outcomes, including length of stay (LoS), in-hospital mortality, discharge destination and all-cause hospital readmissions, were sourced from the dataset. Comparative analyses were performed and multivariable logistic methods were used to estimate the adjusted associations between agitation (exposure) and outcomes.
Overall, 53,156 episodes were selected, of which 6,586 had an agitation code. These were mostly related to male, younger inpatients (mean 81.19 vs. 83.29 years, 0.001), had a higher comorbidity burden, stayed longer at the hospital (median 9.00 vs. 8.00 days, 0.001) and frequently ended being transferred to another facility with inpatient care. Agitation was shown to independently increase LoS (aOR = 1.385; 95%CI:1.314-1.461), but not the risk of a fatal outcome (aOR = 0.648; 95%CI:0.600-0.700).
These results support the importance of detecting and managing agitation early on admission, since its prompt management may prevent lengthy disruptive hospitalizations.
根据《国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本》(ICD - 9 - CM)编码,对2010 - 2015年葡萄牙大陆地区所有因痴呆相关激越而住院的情况进行特征描述,并调查激越与住院结局之间是否存在关联。
使用一个行政数据集进行回顾性观察研究,该数据集包含葡萄牙大陆所有公立医院的数据。仅选取年龄在65岁以上、经ICD - 9 - CM编码确诊为伴有行为障碍的痴呆(294.11和294.21)以及不伴有行为障碍的痴呆(294.10和294.20)的患者的住院记录。根据是否存在激越编码对记录进一步分组。对于每个记录,从数据集中获取人口统计学数据和住院结局,包括住院时间(LoS)、院内死亡率、出院去向和全因再入院情况。进行了比较分析,并使用多变量逻辑方法估计激越(暴露因素)与结局之间的校正关联。
总体而言,共选取了53,156条记录,其中6,586条有激越编码。这些记录大多与男性、较年轻的住院患者相关(平均年龄81.19岁对83.29岁,P = 0.001),合并症负担更高,住院时间更长(中位数9.00天对8.00天,P = 0.001),并且经常最终被转至另一家提供住院护理的机构。结果显示,激越会独立增加住院时间(调整后比值比[aOR]=1.385;95%置信区间[CI]:1.314 - 1.461),但不会增加致命结局的风险(aOR = 0.648;95%CI:0.600 - 0.700)。
这些结果支持在入院时尽早发现和管理激越的重要性,因为及时管理可能预防长时间的干扰性住院。