Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):17-23. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21343. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Copay assistance programs provide financial assistance for patients to access medicines and may be one solution to addressing patient affordability, especially because of additional financial hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These programs have been scrutinized by payers and policymakers, but there is little information on the patient perspective to inform these policy discussions. To understand patients' perspectives and use of copay assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. A nationwide cross-sectional online descriptive patient survey was administered to collect data from adult recent medication users and caregivers. Data on demographics, skipping/stopping medications, current/past/future use of copay assistance, perceptions of copay assistance, and alternative actions taken if copay assistance was unavailable were collected. Descriptive analysis was conducted across the total sample, with subgroup analysis between those using and not using specialty pharmacies conducted on select measures. Analyses were conducted using STATA version 14.2. The final sample consisted of 1,001 adults aged 18 years or older. Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported currently or previously using copay assistance, with use higher among specialty pharmacy users vs non-specialty pharmacy users (46% vs 15%, < 0.01). Copay assistance programs were viewed positively by most respondents (> 70%), with the proportion who viewed them "somewhat or more positively" during the COVID-19 pandemic growing significantly more among specialty pharmacy users than among non-specialty pharmacy users (53% vs 24%, < 0.01). Respondents using copay assistance programs indicated they would take on more debt and cut back in other areas as alternatives to copay assistance, if unavailable. The alternative actions differed by specialty pharmacy use, with specialty pharmacy users reporting being more likely to use savings/retirement funds to help cover the cost (44% vs 22%, < 0.01) or switch insurance plans (36% vs 22%, = 0.03). Patients' positive perceptions of copay assistance programs have grown during the COVID-19 pandemic, and removing access to these programs may result in further debt and/or loss of savings for patients, especially for those using specialty medicines. Future patient-centric research is warranted and should be central to informing future policy discussions on the regulation of copay assistance programs. W Wong and K Jinnett are employees of Genentech, Inc, and have stock in Roche (outside the submitted work). Research reported in this publication was supported by Genentech, Inc. Editorial services were provided by Esther Tazartes, MS, of Global Outcomes Group. These services were funded by Genentech, Inc.
药品共付援助计划为患者获取药物提供了经济援助,可能是解决患者负担能力问题的一种方案,尤其是因为 COVID-19 大流行带来了额外的经济困难。这些计划受到了支付者和政策制定者的审查,但关于患者视角的信息很少,无法为这些政策讨论提供信息。为了了解患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对共付援助的看法和使用情况,我们进行了一项全国性的横断面在线描述性患者调查,从成年近期用药者和护理者中收集数据。收集的数据包括人口统计学、漏服/停服药物、当前/过去/未来使用共付援助、对共付援助的看法以及在没有共付援助的情况下采取的替代措施。对总样本进行描述性分析,并在特定措施上对使用和不使用专科药房的人群进行亚组分析。分析使用 STATA 版本 14.2 进行。最终样本包括 1001 名 18 岁或以上的成年人。28%的受访者报告目前或以前使用过共付援助,使用专科药房的患者比使用非专科药房的患者更高(46%比 15%,<0.01)。大多数受访者对共付援助计划持积极看法(>70%),在 COVID-19 大流行期间,使用专科药房的患者对共付援助计划的看法“更为积极”的比例显著高于非专科药房的患者(53%比 24%,<0.01)。使用共付援助计划的受访者表示,如果无法获得援助,他们将承担更多债务并削减其他方面的开支。如果无法获得共付援助,专科药房使用者比非专科药房使用者更有可能使用储蓄/退休基金来帮助支付费用(44%比 22%,<0.01)或更换保险计划(36%比 22%,=0.03)。患者对共付援助计划的积极看法在 COVID-19 大流行期间有所增加,如果取消这些计划的获取途径,可能会导致患者进一步负债和/或损失储蓄,尤其是使用专科药物的患者。未来需要进行以患者为中心的研究,这应是告知共付援助计划监管未来政策讨论的核心。W Wong 和 K Jinnett 是罗氏公司(Genentech, Inc)的员工,拥有罗氏(Roche)股票(与提交的工作无关)。本研究报告中报告的研究由罗氏公司(Genentech, Inc)资助。编辑服务由 Esther Tazartes, MS 提供,她来自 Global Outcomes Group。这些服务由罗氏公司(Genentech, Inc)资助。