Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):257.e1-257.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Clinicians in the United States have rapidly adopted opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. However, little is known about racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption. Surgical innovations in gynecology may be adopted differentially across racial and ethnic groups, exacerbating current disparities in quality of care.
This study aimed to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption across inpatient and outpatient settings and assess the effect of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use on these differences.
A sample of 650,905 women aged 18 to 50 years undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or surgical sterilization from 2011 to 2018 was identified using the Premier Healthcare Database, an all-payer hospital administrative database, including more than 700 hospitals across the United States. The association between race and ethnicity and opportunistic salpingectomy use was examined using multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects log-binomial regression models accounting for hospital-level clustering. Models included race and ethnicity by year of surgery (2011-2013 [before guideline] and 2014-2018 [after guideline]) interaction term to test whether racial and ethnic differences in opportunistic salpingectomy adoption changed with the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use.
From 2011 to 2018, 82,792 women underwent hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy (non-Hispanic White, 60.3%; non-Hispanic Black, 18.8%; Hispanic, 12.2%; non-Hispanic other race, 8.7%) and 23,398 women underwent opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization (non-Hispanic White, 64.7%; non-Hispanic Black, 10.8%; Hispanic, 16.7%; non-Hispanic other race, 7.8%). The proportion of hysterectomy procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 6.3% in 2011 to 59.7% in 2018 (9.5-fold increase), and the proportion of sterilization procedures involving an opportunistic salpingectomy increased from 0.7% in 2011 to 19.4% in 2018 (27.7-fold increase). In multivariable-adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black (risk ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97), Hispanic (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.00), and non-Hispanic other race women (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.96) were less likely to undergo hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women. A significant interaction between race and ethnicity and year of surgery was noted in non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic White women (P<.001), with a reduction in differences in hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy use after national guideline release (risk ratio, 0.80 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.88]; risk ratio, 0.98 [95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.01]). Moreover, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to undergo an opportunistic salpingectomy for sterilization than non-Hispanic White women (risk ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.95), with no difference by year of surgery (P=.62). Stratified analyses by hysterectomy route and age at surgery revealed similar results.
Although opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention has been rapidly adopted in the United States, our findings suggested that its adoption has not been equitable across racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other race women were less likely to undergo opportunistic salpingectomy than non-Hispanic White women even after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, procedural, hospital, and provider characteristics. These differences persisted after the release of national guidelines supporting opportunistic salpingectomy use. Future research should focus on understanding the reasons for these differences to inform interventions that promote equity in opportunistic salpingectomy use.
美国的临床医生迅速采用了机会性输卵管切除术来预防卵巢癌。然而,关于种族和族裔之间在机会性输卵管切除术采用方面的差异,人们知之甚少。妇科手术创新可能会在不同的种族和族裔群体中存在差异,从而加剧目前护理质量方面的差异。
本研究旨在评估在住院和门诊环境中,种族和族裔之间在机会性输卵管切除术采用方面的差异,并评估支持机会性输卵管切除术使用的国家指南对这些差异的影响。
使用 Premier Healthcare Database(一个涵盖美国 700 多家医院的全支付医院行政数据库),从 2011 年至 2018 年期间,对接受子宫切除术和卵巢保留或手术绝育的 18 至 50 岁的 650905 名女性进行了一项抽样研究。使用多变量调整的混合效应对数二项式回归模型,考虑了医院层面的聚类,评估了种族和族裔与机会性输卵管切除术使用之间的关联。模型包括种族和族裔与手术年份(2011-2013 年[在指南发布之前]和 2014-2018 年[在指南发布之后])的交互项,以测试随着支持机会性输卵管切除术使用的国家指南的发布,种族和族裔之间在机会性输卵管切除术采用方面的差异是否发生了变化。
从 2011 年至 2018 年,82792 名女性接受了子宫切除术和机会性输卵管切除术(非西班牙裔白人,60.3%;非西班牙裔黑人,18.8%;西班牙裔,12.2%;非西班牙裔其他种族,8.7%),23398 名女性接受了机会性输卵管切除术进行绝育(非西班牙裔白人,64.7%;非西班牙裔黑人,10.8%;西班牙裔,16.7%;非西班牙裔其他种族,7.8%)。涉及机会性输卵管切除术的子宫切除术比例从 2011 年的 6.3%增加到 2018 年的 59.7%(增加了 9.5 倍),涉及机会性输卵管切除术的绝育术比例从 2011 年的 0.7%增加到 2018 年的 19.4%(增加了 27.7 倍)。在多变量调整模型中,非西班牙裔黑人(风险比,0.94;95%置信区间,0.92-0.97)、西班牙裔(风险比,0.98;95%置信区间,0.95-1.00)和非西班牙裔其他种族的女性(风险比,0.93;95%置信区间,0.90-0.96)比非西班牙裔白人女性更不可能接受子宫切除术和机会性输卵管切除术。与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,非西班牙裔黑人女性的差异在统计学上显著(P<.001),并且在国家指南发布后,子宫切除术和机会性输卵管切除术的使用差异有所减少(风险比,0.80[95%置信区间,0.73-0.88];风险比,0.98[95%置信区间,0.95-1.01])。此外,与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,非西班牙裔黑人女性更不可能接受绝育术的机会性输卵管切除术(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.88-0.95),且手术年份无差异(P=.62)。按子宫切除术途径和手术年龄进行分层分析,结果相似。
尽管美国迅速采用了机会性输卵管切除术来预防卵巢癌,但我们的研究结果表明,其采用在不同种族和族裔群体中并不平等。非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔和非西班牙裔其他种族的女性比非西班牙裔白人女性更不可能接受机会性输卵管切除术,即使在调整了社会人口统计学、临床、手术、医院和提供者特征后也是如此。在支持机会性输卵管切除术使用的国家指南发布后,这些差异仍然存在。未来的研究应关注理解这些差异的原因,以提供促进机会性输卵管切除术使用公平性的干预措施。