Suppr超能文献

西北哥斯达黎加人类采集和动物捕食海龟巢的动态。

Dynamics of human take and animal predation on sea turtle nests in Northwest Costa Rica.

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.

Rescue Center for Endangered Marine Species (CREMA), San Jose, Costa Rica.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Apr 26;10:e12925. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12925. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Many conservation projects relocate sea turtle eggs to hatcheries to protect the sea turtle nests from the anthropogenic and natural threats they face in the early stages of development. The Rescue Center for Endangered Marine Species (CREMA) manages four sea turtle conservation projects on the nesting beaches of the Southern Nicoya Peninsula in Costa Rica, where the predominant nesting activity is from olive ridley turtles (). Two of these nesting projects are based in Costa de Oro and San Miguel, which are adjacent beaches divided by an estuary. In this study, we compared the dynamics and rates of human and animal predation of nests prior to being relocated to the hatchery on both nesting beaches from 2012 to 2018. We hypothesized that human take and animal predation were compensatory threats, meaning that lower human take may result in higher animal predation, and vice versa, resulting in a similar number of nests lost to predation overall. We discuss the community-based conservation programs on both beaches, one of which has been monitored since 1998 (San Miguel) and the other of which has been monitored since 2012 (Costa de Oro). We found that Costa de Oro exhibited high rates of human take with up to 51% of nests being extracted per season, which has decreased since the conservation project was established. Human take was significantly higher than animal predation on both beaches and human take was significantly higher in Costa de Oro. While San Miguel exhibited higher animal predation, the difference was not statistically significant. Higher depredation by animals corresponded to higher overall nest abundance on both beaches. We were unable to find evidence that human take or animal predation increased in the absence of the other threat, suggesting a lack of compensatory effects of predation. Our findings support further analysis of animal predation and a continuation of patrol-based conservation efforts as well as community outreach to attempt to merge cultural values with sea turtle conservation.

摘要

许多保护项目将海龟蛋转移到孵化场,以保护海龟巢免受其在早期发育阶段面临的人为和自然威胁。濒危海洋物种救援中心(CREMA)在哥斯达黎加南尼科亚半岛的筑巢海滩管理四个海龟保护项目,那里的主要筑巢活动来自橄榄绿海龟()。其中两个筑巢项目位于科斯塔德奥罗和圣米格尔,这两个海滩通过一个河口相邻。在这项研究中,我们比较了 2012 年至 2018 年在孵化场转移之前,这两个筑巢海滩上人类和动物捕食巢穴之前的动态和速度。我们假设人类取食和动物捕食是互补的威胁,这意味着较低的人类取食可能导致较高的动物捕食,反之亦然,因此总体而言,因捕食而失去的巢穴数量相似。我们讨论了这两个海滩的基于社区的保护项目,其中一个自 1998 年以来一直在监测(圣米格尔),另一个自 2012 年以来一直在监测(科斯塔德奥罗)。我们发现,科斯塔德奥罗的人类取食率很高,每个季节有高达 51%的巢穴被取出,自保护项目成立以来,这一数字有所下降。在这两个海滩上,人类取食的比例都明显高于动物捕食,而且在科斯塔德奥罗,人类取食的比例更高。虽然圣米格尔的动物捕食率较高,但差异并不具有统计学意义。在这两个海滩上,动物的破坏程度越高,整体巢穴的数量就越多。我们没有发现证据表明,在没有其他威胁的情况下,人类取食或动物捕食会增加,这表明捕食没有产生补偿效应。我们的研究结果支持对动物捕食进行进一步分析,并继续开展基于巡逻的保护工作,以及开展社区外联活动,试图将文化价值观与海龟保护相结合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b978/9053298/0896a72fab3c/peerj-10-12925-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验