Brambilla Enrico, Ferguson Tanner J, Chu Nathan, Ammar David, Yoo Paul
Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc., Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 26;16:1289-1300. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S359605. eCollection 2022.
This is a 2-part study to investigate the agreement between pneumatonometry and direct pressure transducer intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in a perfusion organ culture (POC) model where (1) the perfusion fluid column is open to atmospheric pressure, holding IOP constant to permit evaluation of the impact of negative pressure (NP) on IOP measurements, and (2) the perfusion fluid column is a closed system, allowing IOP to vary with NP application.
The first part incorporated a fluid column open to atmospheric pressure, maintaining IOP constant to permit evaluation of the effect of applied NP on IOP measurement accuracy. In the second part, the POC column was closed, allowing IOP to vary with NP application and permit evaluation of agreement between pneumatonometry and pressure transducer measurements. In each part, four perfused tissues were used in thirteen paired pre-set IOP (10, 20, 25, 30 mmHg) and NP (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mmHg) combinations, resulting in a total of 1040 paired measurements (520 per study). The difference in IOP measurements (Δ IOP = Excursion tonometry - pressure transducer) was calculated at each paired configuration.
During the first part, the mean Δ IOP was -0.7 ± 1.6 mmHg across all measurements. During the second part, the mean Δ IOP across all measurements was +0.7 ± 1.4 mmHg. At NP settings of -5, -10, -15, and -20 mmHg, across all pre-set IOPs, the mean IOP reduction via Excursion tonometry was 3.1 ± 0.3, 5.6 ± 1.3, 8.5 ± 1.7 and 11.2 ± 1.8 mmHg, respectively.
Measurement of IOP via Excursion tonometry yields results within the accuracy range of the pneumatonometry device (per manufacturer) and is minimally impacted by NP application. The IOP-lowering results are consistent with previous studies and further support the effectiveness of the Multi-Pressure Dial in lowering IOP relative to atmospheric pressure.
这是一项分为两部分的研究,旨在调查在灌注器官培养(POC)模型中,眼压计测量与直接压力传感器测量眼内压(IOP)之间的一致性。在该模型中,(1)灌注液柱向大气开放,保持IOP恒定,以评估负压(NP)对IOP测量的影响;(2)灌注液柱为封闭系统,使IOP随NP施加而变化。
第一部分采用向大气开放的液柱,维持IOP恒定,以评估施加的NP对IOP测量准确性的影响。在第二部分中,POC柱是封闭的,使IOP随NP施加而变化,并评估眼压计测量与压力传感器测量之间的一致性。在每一部分中,在13种预先设定的IOP(10、20、25、30 mmHg)和NP(0、5、10、15、20 mmHg)组合下,对4个灌注组织进行测量,总共进行了1040次配对测量(每项研究520次)。在每个配对配置下计算IOP测量值的差异(Δ IOP = 眼压计测量值 - 压力传感器测量值)。
在第一部分中,所有测量的平均Δ IOP为-0.7 ± 1.6 mmHg。在第二部分中,所有测量的平均Δ IOP为+0.7 ± 1.4 mmHg。在NP设置为-5、-10、-15和-20 mmHg时,在所有预先设定的IOP下,通过眼压计测量的平均IOP降低分别为3.1 ± 0.3、5.6 ± 1.3、8.5 ± 1.7和11.2 ± 1.8 mmHg。
通过眼压计测量IOP的结果在眼压计设备(根据制造商)的精度范围内,并且受NP施加的影响最小。降低IOP的结果与先前的研究一致,并进一步支持了多压力Dial相对于大气压降低IOP的有效性。