Abd-Elsayed Alaa, Strand Natalie, Gritsenko Karina, Martens Joshua, Chakravarthy Krishnan, Sayed Dawood, Deer Timothy
University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, Madison, WI, USA.
Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 27;15:1247-1255. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S342653. eCollection 2022.
Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA.
A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA.
A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95-96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks.
Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.
膝神经射频消融术(RFA)是一种有效、微创的手术,常用于治疗因膝关节骨关节炎和膝关节置换失败而导致顽固性膝关节疼痛的患者。据估计,成年人膝关节疼痛的患病率高达40%,且随着人口老龄化持续上升。在过去二十年中,手术医生在膝关节神经RFA手术的患者准备、手术步骤和术后护理方面采用了不同的方法。通过美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)进行了一项调查,以获得对膝关节神经RFA常见做法的普遍评估。
通过SurveyMonkey向ASPN的所有成员发放了一份包含29个问题的调查问卷。成员只能对调查做出一次回应,提交调查后无法更改其回答。在汇总回复后,对每个问题进行评估,以确定膝关节神经RFA的常见做法。
共有378名手术医生回复了调查。对于三个最常靶向的神经,达成了高度共识。95%-96%的受访者治疗了膝下内侧、膝上内侧和膝上外侧分支,而其他靶点的治疗较少。手术医生之间对于是否需要进行第二次诊断性神经阻滞以及用于诊断性神经阻滞的类固醇类型仍存在一些争议。
疼痛科医生使用多种方法进行膝神经消融。调查提供的数据表明,在通过膝神经阻滞和消融治疗膝关节疼痛方面没有标准化方案,并突出了手术医生之间的争议,这些争议应成为未来旨在建立标准化方案的临床研究的目标。