Scientific Director's Office, Carlo Besta Foundation and Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 5;5(5):CD013444. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013444.pub2.
Spasticity and chronic neuropathic pain are common and serious symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). These symptoms increase with disease progression and lead to worsening disability, impaired activities of daily living and quality of life. Anti-spasticity medications and analgesics are of limited benefit or poorly tolerated. Cannabinoids may reduce spasticity and pain in people with MS. Demand for symptomatic treatment with cannabinoids is high. A thorough understanding of the current body of evidence regarding benefits and harms of these drugs is required.
To assess benefit and harms of cannabinoids, including synthetic, or herbal and plant-derived cannabinoids, for reducing symptoms for adults with MS.
We searched the following databases from inception to December 2021: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library), CINAHL (EBSCO host), LILACS, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the US National Institutes of Health clinical trial register, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, the International Association for Cannabinoid Medicines databank. We hand searched citation lists of included studies and relevant reviews.
We included randomised parallel or cross-over trials (RCTs) evaluating any cannabinoid (including herbal Cannabis, Cannabis flowers, plant-based cannabinoids, or synthetic cannabinoids) irrespective of dose, route, frequency, or duration of use for adults with MS.
We followed standard Cochrane methodology. To assess bias in included studies, we used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for parallel RCTs and crossover trials. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following outcomes: reduction of 30% in the spasticity Numeric Rating Scale, pain relief of 50% or greater in the Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity, much or very much improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs) (tolerability), serious adverse events (SAEs), nervous system disorders, psychiatric disorders, physical dependence.
We included 25 RCTs with 3763 participants of whom 2290 received cannabinoids. Age ranged from 18 to 60 years, and between 50% and 88% participants across the studies were female. The included studies were 3 to 48 weeks long and compared nabiximols, an oromucosal spray with a plant derived equal (1:1) combination of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) (13 studies), synthetic cannabinoids mimicking THC (7 studies), an oral THC extract of Cannabis sativa (2 studies), inhaled herbal Cannabis (1 study) against placebo. One study compared dronabinol, THC extract of Cannabis sativa and placebo, one compared inhaled herbal Cannabis, dronabinol and placebo. We identified eight ongoing studies. Critical outcomes • Spasticity: nabiximols probably increases the number of people who report an important reduction of perceived severity of spasticity compared with placebo (odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56 to 4.04; 5 RCTs, 1143 participants; I = 67%; moderate-certainty evidence). The absolute effect was 216 more people (95% CI 99 more to 332 more) per 1000 reporting benefit with cannabinoids than with placebo. • Chronic neuropathic pain: we found only one small trial that measured the number of participants reporting substantial pain relief with a synthetic cannabinoid compared with placebo (OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 16.17; 1 study, 48 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether cannabinoids reduce chronic neuropathic pain intensity. • Treatment discontinuation due to AEs: cannabinoids may increase slightly the number of participants who discontinue treatment compared with placebo (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.84; 21 studies, 3110 participants; I² = 17%; low-certainty evidence); the absolute effect is 39 more people (95% CI 15 more to 76 more) per 1000 people. Important outcomes • PGIC: cannabinoids probably increase the number of people who report 'very much' or 'much' improvement in health status compared with placebo (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.36; 8 studies, 1215 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). The absolute effect is 113 more people (95% CI 57 more to 175 more) per 1000 people reporting improvement. • HRQoL: cannabinoids may have little to no effect on HRQoL (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.02; 8 studies, 1942 participants; I = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • SAEs: cannabinoids may result in little to no difference in the number of participants who have SAEs compared with placebo (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.99; 20 studies, 3124 participants; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • AEs of the nervous system: cannabinoids may increase nervous system disorders compared with placebo (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.44; 7 studies, 1154 participants; I² = 63%; low-certainty evidence); • Psychiatric disorders: cannabinoids may increase psychiatric disorders compared with placebo (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.88; 6 studies, 1122 participants; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence); • Drug tolerance: the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cannabinoids on drug tolerance (OR 3.07, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.95; 2 studies, 458 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, nabiximols probably reduces the severity of spasticity in the short-term in people with MS. We are uncertain about the effect on chronic neurological pain and health-related quality of life. Cannabinoids may increase slightly treatment discontinuation due to AEs, nervous system and psychiatric disorders compared with placebo. We are uncertain about the effect on drug tolerance. The overall certainty of evidence is limited by short-term duration of the included studies.
痉挛和慢性神经病理性疼痛是多发性硬化症(MS)患者常见且严重的症状。这些症状随疾病进展而加重,导致残疾恶化、日常生活活动能力受损和生活质量下降。抗痉挛药物和镇痛药的疗效有限或耐受性差。大麻素可能减轻 MS 患者的痉挛和疼痛。对大麻素进行对症治疗的需求很高。需要全面了解这些药物的益处和危害的现有证据。
评估大麻素(包括合成、草药和植物衍生的大麻素)对减轻 MS 成人症状的益处和危害。
我们从成立到 2021 年 12 月检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(Cochrane 图书馆)、CINAHL(EBSCO 主机)、LILACS、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册处、欧盟临床试验注册处、国际大麻素药物协会数据库。我们还手动检索了纳入研究的参考文献列表和相关综述。
我们纳入了随机平行或交叉试验(RCTs),评估了任何大麻素(包括草药大麻、大麻花、植物源大麻素或合成大麻素),无论剂量、途径、频率或使用时间长短,用于 MS 成人。
我们遵循了标准的 Cochrane 方法。为了评估纳入研究中的偏倚,我们使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚 2 工具评估了平行 RCT 和交叉试验。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估了以下结局的证据确定性:痉挛的数字评定量表(Numeric Rating Scale)减少 30%、疼痛的数字评定量表-疼痛强度(Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Intensity)缓解 50%或更多、患者总体印象变化(Patient Global Impression of Change,PGIC)、健康相关生活质量(Health-Related Quality of Life,HRQoL)、因不良事件(Adverse Events,AEs)(耐受性)、严重不良事件(Serious Adverse Events,SAEs)、神经系统疾病、精神障碍、躯体依赖的退出率。
我们纳入了 25 项 RCT,共纳入 3763 名参与者,其中 2290 名接受了大麻素治疗。参与者年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间,各研究中 50%至 88%的参与者为女性。纳入的研究持续 3 至 48 周,比较了nabiximols,一种源自植物的等比例(1:1)组合的四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)的口腔黏膜喷雾(13 项研究)、模仿 THC 的合成大麻素(7 项研究)、一种大麻 sativa 的口服提取物(2 项研究)、吸入草药大麻(1 项研究)与安慰剂。一项研究比较了 dronabinol、大麻 sativa 的 THC 提取物和安慰剂,一项研究比较了吸入草药大麻、dronabinol 和安慰剂。我们确定了八项正在进行的研究。关键结局:•痉挛:nabiximols 可能会增加报告痉挛严重程度显著减轻的人数比例,与安慰剂相比(比值比(OR)2.51,95%置信区间(CI)1.56 至 4.04;5 项 RCT,1143 名参与者;I = 67%;中等确定性证据)。绝对效果是,与安慰剂相比,每 1000 名报告受益的人中,有 216 人更多(95%CI 99 人至 332 人)接受大麻素治疗。•慢性神经病理性疼痛:我们只发现了一项小型试验,测量了与安慰剂相比,合成大麻素治疗的参与者报告有显著缓解慢性神经病理性疼痛的人数(OR 4.23,95%CI 1.11 至 16.17;1 项研究,48 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。我们不确定大麻素是否能减轻慢性神经病理性疼痛的强度。•因 AEs 停药:与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能会略微增加因 AEs 而停药的参与者人数(OR 2.41,95%CI 1.51 至 3.84;21 项研究,3110 名参与者;I² = 17%;低确定性证据);绝对效果是,与安慰剂相比,每 1000 人中有 39 人(95%CI 15 人至 76 人)更多人停药。重要结局:•PGIC:与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能会增加报告健康状况“非常”或“明显”改善的人数比例(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.37 至 2.36;8 项研究,1215 名参与者;I² = 0%;中等确定性证据)。绝对效果是,与安慰剂相比,每 1000 名报告改善的人中,有 113 人(95%CI 57 人至 175 人)更多人接受大麻素治疗。•HRQoL:大麻素可能对 HRQoL 没有影响或影响很小(SMD-0.08,95%CI-0.17 至 0.02;8 项研究,1942 名参与者;I = 0%;低确定性证据);•SAEs:与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能导致 SAE 人数没有差异(OR 1.38,95%CI 0.96 至 1.99;20 项研究,3124 名参与者;I² = 0%;低确定性证据);•神经系统疾病:与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能会增加神经系统疾病(OR 2.61,95%CI 1.53 至 4.44;7 项研究,1154 名参与者;I² = 63%;低确定性证据);•精神障碍:与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能会增加精神障碍(OR 1.94,95%CI 1.31 至 2.88;6 项研究,1122 名参与者;I² = 0%;低确定性证据);•药物耐受性:关于大麻素对药物耐受性的影响,证据非常不确定(OR 3.07,95%CI 0.12 至 75.95;2 项研究,458 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。
与安慰剂相比,nabiximols 可能会减少 MS 患者痉挛的严重程度,短期有效。我们不确定它对慢性神经病理性疼痛和健康相关生活质量的影响。与安慰剂相比,大麻素可能会略微增加因 AEs、神经系统和精神障碍而停药的人数。我们不确定它对药物耐受性的影响。纳入研究的短期持续时间限制了整体证据的确定性。