Dept of Neonatology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Dept of Neonatology, Vijay Marie Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;181(7):2831-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04463-2. Epub 2022 May 6.
Various studies validated and compared Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) and Clinical Risk Index for Babies-II (CRIB-II) admission sickness severity scores for predicting survival, but very few studies compared them for predicting the morbidities in preterm infants. In this multicenter prospective observational study, SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II newborn illness severity scores were compared for predicting mortality and morbidities in infants with gestational age of ≤ 32 weeks. Major morbidities were classified as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abnormal cranial ultrasound (presence of intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or more or periventricular leukomalacia grade II to IV), and retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment. Combined adverse outcome was defined as death or any major morbidity. Comparison of the scoring systems was done by area under the curve (AUC) on receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC curve) analysis. A total of 419 neonates who were admitted to 5 participating NICUs were studied. The mortality rate in the study population was 8.8%. Both CRIB-II (AUC: 0.795) and SNAPPE-II (AUC: 0.78) had good predictive ability for in-hospital mortality. For predicting any one of the major morbidities and combined adverse outcome, CRIB-II had better predictive ability than SNAPPE-II with AUC of 0.83 vs. 0.70 and 0.85 vs. 0.74, respectively.
In infants with gestational age of ≤ 32 weeks, both CRIB-II and SNAPPE-II are good scoring systems for predicting mortality. CRIB-II, being a simpler scoring system and having better predictive ability for major morbidities and combined adverse outcome, is preferable over SNAPPE-II.
• SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II scores have good predictive ability on in-hospital mortality in preterm neonates.
• SNAPPE-II and CRIB-II both have good predictive ability for mortality, but CRIB-II has better ability for short-term morbidities related to the prematurity.
各种研究验证并比较了新生儿急性生理学与围产期扩展评分Ⅱ(SNAPPE-Ⅱ)和婴儿临床风险指数Ⅱ(CRIB-Ⅱ)的入院疾病严重程度评分,以预测存活率,但很少有研究比较它们对预测早产儿发病率的作用。在这项多中心前瞻性观察研究中,比较了 SNAPPE-Ⅱ和 CRIB-Ⅱ新生儿疾病严重程度评分,以预测胎龄≤32 周的新生儿的死亡率和发病率。主要的发病率被分类为支气管肺发育不良、异常头颅超声(存在 III 级以上脑室出血或 II 至 IV 级脑室周围白质软化)和需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变。联合不良结局定义为死亡或任何主要发病率。通过接受者操作特性曲线(ROC 曲线)分析中的曲线下面积(AUC)比较评分系统。共研究了 5 个参与 NICU 的 419 名新生儿。研究人群的死亡率为 8.8%。CRIB-Ⅱ(AUC:0.795)和 SNAPPE-Ⅱ(AUC:0.78)对院内死亡率均有较好的预测能力。对于预测任何一种主要发病率和联合不良结局,CRIB-Ⅱ的预测能力均优于 SNAPPE-Ⅱ,AUC 分别为 0.83 比 0.70 和 0.85 比 0.74。
在胎龄≤32 周的婴儿中,CRIB-Ⅱ和 SNAPPE-Ⅱ都是预测死亡率的良好评分系统。CRIB-Ⅱ是一种更简单的评分系统,对主要发病率和联合不良结局的预测能力更好,优于 SNAPPE-Ⅱ。
SNAPPE-Ⅱ和 CRIB-Ⅱ评分对早产儿院内死亡率有较好的预测能力。
SNAPPE-Ⅱ和 CRIB-Ⅱ对死亡率均有较好的预测能力,但 CRIB-Ⅱ对与早产相关的短期发病率有更好的预测能力。