Newton Bruce W
Department of Anatomy, Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC 27546 USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Feb 28;32(2):423-436. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01526-9. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Past studies examining the cognitive empathy of medical school graduates grouped the various residency selections vs. parsing them out. This study examines both affective and cognitive empathy scores of osteopathic medical school graduates entering eleven different residency specialties.
Participants from the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine (CUSOM) classes of 2017-2019 completed the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES; measuring affective empathy) and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy, Student version (JSE-S; measuring cognitive empathy). Empathy scores were compared to residency choice upon graduation. The specialty choices were broken into two groups: Core specialties (i.e., people-oriented) that include Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/Gyn), Pediatrics, and Psychiatry. The remaining specialties are considered Non-Core specialties (i.e., technical/procedure-oriented) and included Anesthesiology, Diagnostic Radiology, Emergency Medicine, General Surgery, Neurology, and Orthopedics. Results are compared to data from the nationwide Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE).
Women graduates tended to have larger BEES and JSE-S scores than men. Affective empathy scores were the largest for students selecting Core specialties. Four of these Core specialties were in the top four positions out of the eleven specialties selected by eight or more graduates. None of the eleven specialties was ranked higher than the 50th percentile compared to BEES score norms. Cognitive empathy scores were also the largest for students selecting Core specialties. All five of the Core specialties were in the top six positions out of the eleven specialties. None of the eleven specialties ranked greater than the 39th percentile when compared to OMS-III and OMS-IV POMEE data. Only women entering Psychiatry had a JSE-S score that was greater than the 50th percentile.
Osteopathic graduates selecting the five Core specialties have BEES and JSE-S scores that are, usually, larger than students entering Non-Core specialties. For either survey instrument, both Pediatrics and Family Medicine were first and second out of a possible 11 positions, respectively. Most CUSOM graduates had JSE-S scores lower than their peers in other osteopathic medical schools that participated in the POMEE study. When the CUSOM data are compared to allopathic data, there is no clear evidence that osteopathic students have substantially higher affective or cognitive empathy scores than their allopathic peers. Therefore, it appears that medical students who select osteopathy for its tenant of a more holistic approach to patient care are no more empathetic than students studying allopathic medicine. Several suggestions are made on how to potentially increase student empathy during undergraduate medical education.
以往关于医学院毕业生认知共情能力的研究,将各种住院医师选择归为一组,而非逐一分析。本研究考察了进入11个不同住院医师专科的整骨医学院毕业生的情感共情和认知共情得分。
坎贝尔大学杰里·M·华莱士整骨医学院(CUSOM)2017 - 2019届的参与者完成了平衡情绪共情量表(BEES;测量情感共情)和杰斐逊共情量表学生版(JSE - S;测量认知共情)。将共情得分与毕业时的住院医师选择进行比较。专科选择分为两组:核心专科(即以人为本),包括家庭医学、内科、妇产科、儿科和精神病学。其余专科被视为非核心专科(即技术/程序导向),包括麻醉学、诊断放射学、急诊医学、普通外科、神经病学和骨科。结果与全国性的整骨医学教育与共情项目(POMEE)的数据进行比较。
女性毕业生的BEES和JSE - S得分往往高于男性。选择核心专科的学生情感共情得分最高。在8名或更多毕业生选择的11个专科中,这5个核心专科中有4个排在前四位。与BEES得分标准相比,这11个专科中没有一个排名高于第50百分位。选择核心专科的学生认知共情得分也最高。5个核心专科在11个专科中均排在前六位。与POMEE的OMS - III和OMS - IV数据相比,这11个专科中没有一个排名高于第39百分位。只有进入精神病学专业的女性JSE - S得分高于第50百分位。
选择5个核心专科的整骨医学毕业生的BEES和JSE - S得分通常高于进入非核心专科的学生。对于这两种调查工具,儿科和家庭医学在可能的11个排名中分别位列第一和第二。大多数CUSOM毕业生的JSE - S得分低于参与POMEE研究的其他整骨医学院的同龄人。当将CUSOM的数据与西医的数据进行比较时,没有明确证据表明整骨医学学生的情感或认知共情得分显著高于西医同龄人。因此,那些因整骨医学以更全面的方式对待患者护理这一理念而选择该专业的医学生,似乎并不比学习西医的学生更具共情能力。文中针对如何在本科医学教育中潜在地提高学生的共情能力提出了一些建议。