Gómez-Llobell Marina, Peleteiro Raíndo Andrés, Climent Medina Jose, Gómez Centurión Ignacio, Mosquera Orgueira Adrián
Hematology Department, Medical University General Hospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:882531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882531. eCollection 2022.
Experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still limited and based on early clinical trials, with no reported randomized clinical data. In this study, we reviewed the available evidence on the use of ICIs, either in monotherapy or in combination with other treatments, in different AML settings, including newly diagnosed AML, relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML and maintenance treatment after allogeneic-HSCT (allo-HSCT).
A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed electronic database as primary source to identify the studies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line and R/R AML. We recorded Overall Response (ORR), Complete Response (CR) and Complete Response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rates, overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse events ≥ grade 3 (irAEs). Hereafter, we analyzed the overall profile of these ICIs by performing a meta-analysis of the reported outcomes.
A total of 13 studies were identified where ICI was used in patients with AML. ORR across these studies was 42% (IC95%, 31% - 54%) and CR/CRi was 33% (IC95%, 22%-45%). Efficacy was also assessed considering the AML setting (first-line vs. relapsed/refractory) and results pointed to higher response rates in first-line, compared to R/R. Mean overall survival was 8.9 months [median 8 months, (IC95%, 3.9 - 15.5)]. Differences between first line and R/R settings were observed, since average overall survival in first line was 12.0 months, duplicating the OS in R/R which was 7.3 months. Additionally, the most specific adverse events (AEs) of these therapies are immune-related adverse events (irAEs), derived from their inflammatory effects. Grade ≥3 irAEs rate was low and similar among studies [12% (95%CI 8% - 16%)].
ICIs in combination with intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents or other targeted therapies are gaining interest in the management of hematological malignancies such as AML. However, results obtained from clinical trials are modest and limited by both, the type of design and the clinical trial phase. Hopefully, the prospective study of these therapies in late-stage development could help to identify patients who may benefit from ICI therapy.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)的经验仍然有限,且基于早期临床试验,尚无随机临床数据报道。在本研究中,我们回顾了ICI在不同AML情况下(包括新诊断的AML、复发或难治性(R/R)AML以及异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后的维持治疗)单药使用或与其他治疗联合使用的现有证据。
以PubMed电子数据库为主要来源进行系统文献综述,以确定涉及一线和R/R AML中免疫检查点抑制剂的研究。我们记录了总缓解率(ORR)、完全缓解率(CR)和伴有血细胞计数未完全恢复的完全缓解率(CRi)、总生存期(OS)以及≥3级免疫相关不良事件(irAE)。此后,我们通过对报告结果进行荟萃分析来分析这些ICI的总体情况。
共确定了13项在AML患者中使用ICI的研究。这些研究的ORR为42%(IC95%,31% - 54%),CR/CRi为33%(IC95%,22% - 45%)。还根据AML情况(一线治疗与复发/难治性治疗)评估了疗效,结果表明一线治疗的缓解率高于R/R治疗。平均总生存期为8.9个月[中位数8个月,(IC95%,3.9 - 15.5)]。观察到一线治疗和R/R治疗情况之间的差异,因为一线治疗的平均总生存期为12.0个月,是R/R治疗中总生存期(7.3个月)的两倍。此外,这些治疗最特定的不良事件(AE)是免疫相关不良事件(irAE),源于其炎症效应。≥3级irAE发生率较低,且各研究之间相似[12%(95%CI 8% - 16%)]。
ICI与强化化疗、去甲基化药物或其他靶向治疗联合使用在AML等血液系统恶性肿瘤的管理中越来越受到关注。然而,从临床试验中获得的结果并不理想,且受到设计类型和临床试验阶段的限制。希望这些疗法在后期开发中的前瞻性研究能够帮助识别可能从ICI治疗中获益的患者。