Suppr超能文献

在肝移植评估期间使用计算机断层扫描冠状动脉钙化评分进行冠状动脉疾病风险分层

Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Calcium Score for Coronary Artery Disease Risk Stratification During Liver Transplant Evaluation.

作者信息

Bhatti Sabha, Lizaola-Mayo Blanca, Al-Shoha Mohammad, Garcia-Saenz-de-Sicilia Mauricio, Habash Fuad, Ayoub Karam, Karr Michael, Ahmed Zubair, Borja-Cacho Daniel, Duarte-Rojo Andres

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Slot #567, Little Rock, AR, 70205, United States.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Mar-Apr;12(2):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is not considered a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, lifestyle characteristics commonly associated with increased ASCVD risk are highly prevalent in ESLD. Emerging literature shows a high burden of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with ESLD and a high ASCVD risk in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Coronary artery calcium score (CAC) is a noninvasive test providing reliable CAD risk stratification. We implemented an LT evaluation protocol with CAC playing a central role in triaging and determining the need for further CAD assessment. Here, we inform our results from this early experience.

METHODS

Patients with ESLD referred for LT evaluation were prospectively studied. We compared accuracy of CAC against that of CAD risk factors/scores, troponin I, dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect coronary stenosis ≥70 (CAD ≥ 70) per left heart catheterization (LHC). Thirty-day post-LT cardiac outcomes were also analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four of 148 (84%) patients underwent CAC, 106 (72%) DSE/SPECT, and 50 (34%) LHC. CAC ≥ 400 was found in 35 (28%), 100 to 399 in 17 (14%), and <100 in 72 (58%). LHC identified CAD ≥ 70% in 8 of 29 (28%), 2 of 9 (22%), and 0 of 4, respectively. Two acute coronary syndromes occurred after LT in a patient with CAC 811 (CAD < 70%), and one with CAC 347 (CAD ≥ 70%). No patients with CAC < 100 presented with acute coronary syndrome after LT. When using CAD ≥ 70% as primary endpoint of LT evaluation, CAC ≥ 346 was the only test showing predictive usefulness (negative predictive value 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

CAC is a promising tool to guide CAD risk stratification and need for LHC during LT evaluation. Patients with a CAC < 100 can safely undergo LT without the need for LHC or cardiac stress testing, whereas a CAC < 346 accurately rules out significant CAD stenosis (≥70%) on LHC, outperforming other CAD risk-stratification strategies.

摘要

背景

终末期肝病(ESLD)不被视为动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的危险因素。然而,与ASCVD风险增加相关的生活方式特征在ESLD中非常普遍。新出现的文献表明,ESLD患者无症状冠状动脉疾病(CAD)负担较重,肝移植(LT)受者的ASCVD风险较高。冠状动脉钙化评分(CAC)是一种无创检查,可提供可靠的CAD风险分层。我们实施了一项LT评估方案,其中CAC在分流和确定进一步CAD评估需求方面发挥核心作用。在此,我们报告这一早期经验的结果。

方法

对转诊进行LT评估的ESLD患者进行前瞻性研究。我们将CAC的准确性与CAD风险因素/评分、肌钙蛋白I、多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的准确性进行比较,以检测经左心导管检查(LHC)显示冠状动脉狭窄≥70%(CAD≥70)的情况。还分析了LT术后30天的心脏结局。

结果

148例患者中有124例(84%)接受了CAC检查,106例(72%)接受了DSE/SPECT检查,50例(34%)接受了LHC检查。发现CAC≥400的有35例(28%),100至399的有17例(14%),<100的有72例(58%)。LHC分别在29例中的第8例(28%)、9例中的第2例(22%)和4例中的第0例中发现CAD≥70%。LT术后,1例CAC为811(CAD<70%)的患者和1例CAC为347(CAD≥70%)的患者发生了2例急性冠状动脉综合征。LT术后,没有CAC<100的患者出现急性冠状动脉综合征。当将CAD≥70%作为LT评估的主要终点时,CAC≥346是唯一显示出预测有效性的检查(阴性预测值为100%)。

结论

CAC是指导LT评估期间CAD风险分层和LHC需求的有前景的工具。CAC<100的患者可以安全地接受LT,无需进行LHC或心脏负荷试验,而CAC<346可准确排除LHC上显著的CAD狭窄(≥70%),优于其他CAD风险分层策略。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Coronary artery calcium score: current status.冠状动脉钙化评分:现状
Radiol Bras. 2017 May-Jun;50(3):182-189. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0235.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验