Van Elswyk Mary E, Teo Lynn, Lau Clara S, Shanahan Christopher J
Van Elswyk Consulting, Inc., Clark, CO, USA.
Teo Research Consulting, Portland, ME, USA.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Jan 14;6(5):nzac001. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac001. eCollection 2022 May.
The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between dietary patterns and sarcopenia using a protocol developed for use by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and to conduct a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence. Multiple electronic databases were searched for studies investigating sarcopenia risk factors or risk of sarcopenia and dietary patterns. Eligible studies were ) peer-reviewed controlled trials or observational trials, ) involving adult or older-adult human subjects who were healthy and/or at risk for chronic disease, ) comparing the effect of consumption or adherence to dietary patterns (measured as an index/score, factor or cluster analysis; reduced rank regression; or a macronutrient distribution), and ) reported on measures of skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, muscle performance, and/or risk of sarcopenia. Thirty-eight publications met all inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Thirteen observational studies met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Higher adherence to a healthy dietary pattern was associated with a decreased risk of gait speed reduction (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.97). The association between healthy dietary pattern adherence and other intermediate markers or risk of sarcopenia was not statistically significant. The majority of individual studies were judged as "serious" risk of bias and analysis of the collective evidence base was suggestive of publication bias. Studies suggest a significant association between healthy dietary patterns and maintenance of gait speed with age, an intermediate marker of sarcopenia risk, but the evidence base is limited by serious risk of bias, within and between studies. Further research is needed to understand the association between healthy dietary patterns and risk of sarcopenia.
本系统评价的目的是使用为2020年膳食指南咨询委员会制定的方案来研究饮食模式与肌肉减少症之间的关系,并进行荟萃分析以总结证据。我们在多个电子数据库中检索了调查肌肉减少症风险因素或肌肉减少症风险与饮食模式的研究。纳入标准为:) 经同行评审的对照试验或观察性试验;) 涉及健康和/或有慢性病风险的成年人或老年人;) 比较饮食模式的摄入或依从性(以指数/评分、因素或聚类分析、降秩回归或宏量营养素分布衡量)的效果;) 报告骨骼肌质量、肌肉力量、肌肉表现和/或肌肉减少症风险的测量指标。38篇出版物符合定性综合的所有纳入标准。13项观察性研究符合荟萃分析的纳入标准。更高程度地坚持健康饮食模式与步态速度降低风险的降低相关(OR = 0.58;95% CI:0.18,0.97)。坚持健康饮食模式与其他中间标志物或肌肉减少症风险之间的关联无统计学意义。大多数个体研究被判定存在“严重”偏倚风险,对总体证据基础的分析提示存在发表偏倚。研究表明健康饮食模式与随着年龄增长维持步态速度之间存在显著关联,步态速度是肌肉减少症风险的一个中间标志物,但证据基础受到研究内部和研究之间严重偏倚风险的限制。需要进一步研究以了解健康饮食模式与肌肉减少症风险之间的关联。