Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Sep;140:108800. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108800. Epub 2022 May 10.
States' approaches to addressing prenatal substance use are widely heterogeneous, ranging from supportive policies that enhance access to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment to punitive policies that criminalize prenatal substance use. We studied the effect of these prenatal substance use policies (PSUPs) on medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment, including buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone, psychosocial services for SUD treatment, opioid prescriptions, and opioid overdoses among commercially insured pregnant females with OUD. We evaluated: (1) punitive PSUPs criminalizing prenatal substance use or defining it as child maltreatment; (2) supportive PSUPs granting pregnant females priority access to SUD treatment; and (3) supportive PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs for pregnant females.
We analyzed 2006-2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data. The longitudinal sample comprised females aged 15-45 with an OUD diagnosis at least once during the study period. We estimated fixed effects models that compared changes in outcomes between pregnant and nonpregnant females, in states with and without a PSUP, before and after PSUP implementation.
Our analytical sample comprised 2,438,875 person-quarters from 164,538 unique females, of which 13% were pregnant at least once during the study period. We found that following the implementation of PSUPs funding targeted SUD treatment programs, the proportion of opioid overdoses decreased 45% and of any OUD medication increased 11%, with buprenorphine driving this increase (13%). The implementation of SUD treatment priority PSUPs was not associated with significant changes in outcomes. Following punitive PSUP implementation, the proportion receiving psychosocial services for SUD (12%) and methadone (30%) services decreased. In specifications that estimated the impact of criminalizing policies only, the strongest type of punitive PSUP, opioid overdoses increased 45%.
Our findings suggest that supportive approaches that enhance access to SUD treatment may effectively reduce adverse maternal outcomes associated with prenatal opioid use. In contrast, punitive approaches may have harmful effects. These findings support leading medical organizations' stance on PSUPs, which advocate for supportive policies that are centered on increased access to SUD treatment and safeguard against discrimination and stigmatization. Our findings also oppose punitive policies, as they may intensify marginalization of pregnant females with OUD seeking treatment.
各州解决产前物质使用问题的方法差异很大,从支持性政策(增强物质使用障碍治疗的可及性)到惩罚性政策(将产前物质使用定为犯罪)。我们研究了这些产前物质使用政策(PSUP)对治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的药物的影响,包括丁丙诺啡、纳曲酮和美沙酮、治疗物质使用障碍的心理社会服务、阿片类药物处方和商业保险的有 OUD 的孕妇的阿片类药物过量。我们评估了:(1)将产前物质使用定为犯罪或定义为虐待儿童的惩罚性 PSUP;(2)给予孕妇优先获得物质使用障碍治疗的支持性 PSUP;(3)为孕妇提供有针对性的物质使用障碍治疗计划的支持性 PSUP。
我们分析了 2006-2019 年市场扫描商业索赔和遭遇数据。纵向样本包括在研究期间至少有一次 OUD 诊断的 15-45 岁女性。我们估计了固定效应模型,以比较有和没有 PSUP 的州中,在 PSUP 实施前后,怀孕和非怀孕女性的结果变化。
我们的分析样本包括 2438875 人季度,来自 164538 名独特女性,其中 13%在研究期间至少怀孕一次。我们发现,在实施有针对性的 SUD 治疗计划的 PSUP 后,阿片类药物过量的比例下降了 45%,任何 OUD 药物的使用增加了 11%,其中丁丙诺啡推动了这一增长(13%)。实施 SUD 治疗优先 PSUP 与结果无显著变化相关。在实施惩罚性 PSUP 后,接受物质使用障碍心理社会服务(12%)和美沙酮(30%)服务的比例下降。在仅估计定罪政策影响的规范中,最严厉的惩罚性 PSUP 类型,阿片类药物过量增加了 45%。
我们的研究结果表明,支持性的方法,增加获得物质使用障碍治疗的机会,可能有效地减少与产前阿片类药物使用相关的不良母婴结局。相比之下,惩罚性的方法可能会产生有害的影响。这些发现支持了主要医疗组织对 PSUP 的立场,即倡导支持性政策,这些政策以增加获得物质使用障碍治疗为中心,并防止歧视和污名化。我们的研究结果还反对惩罚性政策,因为它们可能加剧寻求治疗的有 OUD 的孕妇的边缘化。