Myllyviita Tanja, Hurmekoski Elias, Kunttu Janni
Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Carbon Balance Manag. 2022 May 17;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13021-022-00205-x.
The building and construction sectors represent a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Replacing concrete and steel with wood is one potential strategy to decrease emissions. On product level, the difference in fossil emissions per functional unit can be quantified with displacement factors (DFs), i.e., the amount of fossil emission reduction achieved per unit of wood use when replacing a functionally equivalent product. We developed DFs for substitution cases representative of typical wood-frame and non-wood frame multi-story buildings in the Nordic countries, considering the expected decarbonization of the energy sector and increased recycling of construction products.
Most of the DFs were positive, implying lower fossil emissions, if wood construction is favored. However, variation in the DFs was substantial and negative DFs implying higher emissions were also detected. All DFs showed a decreasing trend, i.e., the GHG mitigation potential of wood construction significantly decreases under future decarbonization and increased recycling assumptions. If only the decarbonization of the energy sector was considered, the decrease was less dramatic compared to the isolated impact of the recycling of construction materials. The mitigation potential of wood construction appears to be the most sensitive to the GHG emissions of concrete, whereas the emissions of steel seem less influential, and the emissions of wood have only minor influence.
The emission reduction due to the decarbonization of the energy sector and the recycling of construction materials is a favorable outcome but one that reduces the relative environmental benefit of wood construction, which ought to be considered in forest-based mitigation strategies. Broadening the system boundary is required to assess the overall substitution impacts of increased use of wood in construction, including biogenic carbon stock changes in forest ecosystems and in wood products over time, as well as price-mediated market responses.
建筑行业是温室气体(GHG)排放的主要来源之一。用木材替代混凝土和钢材是减少排放的一种潜在策略。在产品层面,每个功能单元的化石排放量差异可以用替代因子(DFs)来量化,即替换功能等效产品时,每使用一单位木材所实现的化石排放减少量。我们针对北欧国家典型木框架和非木框架多层建筑的替代案例开发了替代因子,同时考虑了能源部门预期的脱碳以及建筑产品回收利用的增加。
如果倾向于木结构建筑,大多数替代因子为正值,这意味着化石排放量较低。然而,替代因子的变化幅度很大,也检测到了意味着排放量更高的负替代因子。所有替代因子均呈下降趋势,即在未来脱碳和回收利用增加的假设下,木结构建筑的温室气体减排潜力显著降低。如果仅考虑能源部门的脱碳,与建筑材料回收利用的单独影响相比,这种下降幅度较小。木结构建筑的减排潜力似乎对混凝土的温室气体排放最为敏感,而钢材排放的影响似乎较小,木材排放的影响则微不足道。
能源部门脱碳和建筑材料回收利用带来的减排是一个有利结果,但这降低了木结构建筑的相对环境效益,在基于森林的减排策略中应予以考虑。需要扩大系统边界,以评估建筑中增加木材使用的总体替代影响,包括森林生态系统和木制品中生物碳储量随时间的变化,以及价格介导的市场反应。