Sorbonne Université, ACTION Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Institut de Cardiologie, Paris 75013, France.
CHU Lille, Institut Cœur Poumon, Pôle Cardiovasculaire et Pulmonaire, ACTION Group, Inserm U1011, Institut Pasteur de Lille, EGID, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 1;43(29):2783-2797. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac242.
The respective roles of oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain debated. ATLANTIS is an international, randomized, open-label, superiority trial comparing apixaban to the standard of care.
After successful TAVI, 1500 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive apixaban 5 mg (2.5 mg if impaired renal function or concomitant antiplatelet therapy) (n = 749) twice daily, or standard of care (n = 751). Randomization was stratified by the need for chronic anticoagulation therapy. Standard-of-care patients received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (Stratum 1) or antiplatelet therapy (Stratum 2) if there was an indication for anticoagulation or not, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, systemic embolism, intracardiac or bioprosthesis thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding over 1-year follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding. The primary outcome occurred in 138 (18.4%) and 151 (20.1%) patients receiving apixaban or standard of care, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.16] and there was no evidence of interaction between treatment and stratum (Pinteraction = 0.57). The primary safety endpoint was similar in both groups (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.72-1.44). In Stratum 1 (n = 451), an exploratory analysis showed no difference for all endpoints between apixaban and VKA. In Stratum 2 (n = 1049), the primary outcome and primary safety endpoint did not differ, but obstructive valve thrombosis was reduced with apixaban vs. antiplatelet therapy (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.08-0.46), while a signal of higher non-cardiovascular mortality was observed with apixaban.
After TAVI, apixaban was not superior to the standard of care, irrespective of an indication for oral anticoagulation.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后,口服抗凝或抗血小板治疗的各自作用仍存在争议。ATLANTIS 是一项国际性、随机、开放标签、优效性试验,比较了阿哌沙班与标准治疗的疗效。
在成功进行 TAVI 后,1500 例患者被随机(1:1)分为阿哌沙班组(n=749)和标准治疗组(n=751)。阿哌沙班组接受每日两次 5mg 阿哌沙班(肾功能受损或同时接受抗血小板治疗时为 2.5mg),标准治疗组则接受维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)(分层 1)或抗血小板治疗(分层 2),具体取决于抗凝治疗的需要。分层 1 中,如果有抗凝指征,则接受 VKA;如果无抗凝指征,则接受抗血小板治疗。分层 2 中,如果有抗凝指征,则接受抗血小板治疗;如果无抗凝指征,则接受 VKA。主要终点是 1 年随访期间的死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作、全身性栓塞、心内或生物假体血栓形成、深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞,以及危及生命、致残或大出血等复合事件。主要安全性终点是大出血,定义为严重、致残或危及生命的出血。阿哌沙班组和标准治疗组的主要复合终点事件发生率分别为 138 例(18.4%)和 151 例(20.1%)(风险比 [HR] 0.92;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.73-1.16),且治疗与分层之间无交互作用(P 交互=0.57)。两组的主要安全性终点无差异(HR 1.02;95%CI 0.72-1.44)。分层 1(n=451)中,探索性分析显示阿哌沙班与 VKA 之间所有终点均无差异。分层 2(n=1049)中,主要复合终点和主要安全性终点无差异,但与抗血小板治疗相比,阿哌沙班可降低阻塞性瓣膜血栓形成(HR 0.19;95%CI 0.08-0.46),而阿哌沙班治疗组观察到非心血管死亡率升高的信号。
TAVI 后,阿哌沙班并不优于标准治疗,无论是否存在口服抗凝指征。