Meijers Sebastiaan M, Rademaker Maaike, Meijers Rutger L, Stegeman Inge, Smit Adriana L
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Neurol. 2022 May 2;13:870433. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.870433. eCollection 2022.
In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the evidence regarding the correlation between tinnitus distress and the severity of depressive symptoms in patients with chronic tinnitus. Also, the prevalence of clinically relevant depressive symptoms scores in patients with chronic tinnitus was evaluated.
We performed a systematic review in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library in June 2021 using the terms "depression" and "tinnitus," and their synonyms, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected on relevance and critically appraised regarding risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale.
A total of 1,912 articles were screened on title and abstract after the removal of the duplicates. Eventually, 33 (1.5%) articles were included for the final analysis. Only cross-sectional cohort studies and case-control studies with a low level of evidence and a high risk of bias due to the study design and patient selection were found. Statistically significant correlations between the experienced tinnitus distress and depressive symptoms were reported in 31 out of 33 studies. Clinically relevant depression scores had a prevalence of 4.6-41.7%.
In this systematic review, in which mostly cross-sectional studies were included, a statistically significant correlation was found between the experienced tinnitus distress and the reported severity of symptoms of depression in patients with chronic tinnitus. A wide range of clinically relevant depression scores were reported in included studies. Due to the high risk of bias of included studies it is not possible to provide a definite answer on the existence of this relationship. Future population-based studies are necessary to provide more clarity.
在本系统评价中,我们旨在评估有关慢性耳鸣患者耳鸣困扰与抑郁症状严重程度之间相关性的证据。此外,还评估了慢性耳鸣患者临床相关抑郁症状评分的患病率。
我们于2021年6月按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中使用“抑郁”和“耳鸣”及其同义词进行了系统评价。根据相关性选择研究,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表对偏倚风险进行严格评估。
在去除重复项后,共筛选了1912篇标题和摘要。最终,33篇(1.5%)文章纳入最终分析。仅发现了因研究设计和患者选择而证据水平低且偏倚风险高的横断面队列研究和病例对照研究。33项研究中的31项报告了经历的耳鸣困扰与抑郁症状之间存在统计学显著相关性。临床相关抑郁评分的患病率为4.6%-41.7%。
在本主要纳入横断面研究的系统评价中,发现慢性耳鸣患者经历的耳鸣困扰与报告的抑郁症状严重程度之间存在统计学显著相关性。纳入研究报告了广泛的临床相关抑郁评分。由于纳入研究的偏倚风险高,无法就这种关系的存在给出明确答案。未来需要开展基于人群的研究以提供更多清晰度。