Gordon Louisa G, Nabukalu Doreen, Chan Raymond J, Goldsbury David E, Hobbs Kim, Hunt Lee, Karikios Deme J, Mackay Gillian, Muir Laura, Leigh Lillian, Thamm Carla, Lindsay Daniel, Whittaker Kate, Varlow Megan, McLoone Jordana, Financial Toxicity Working Group On Behalf Of The Cosa
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Population Health Department, Brisbane, Herston, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Nursing and Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Brisbane, Kelvin Grove, Australia.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb;19(1):126-135. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13786. Epub 2022 May 19.
To understand the opinions and current practices of health professionals on the topic of addressing cancer-related financial toxicity among patients.
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through Australian clinical oncology professional organizations/networks. The multidisciplinary Clinical Oncology Society of Australia Financial Toxicity Working Group developed 25 questions relating to the frequency and comfort levels of patient-clinician discussions, opinions about their role, strategies used, and barriers to providing solutions for patients. Descriptive statistics were used and subgroup analyses were undertaken by occupational groups.
Two hundred and seventy-seven health professionals completed the survey. The majority were female (n = 213, 77%), worked in public facilities (200, 72%), and treated patients with varied cancer types across all of Australia. Most participants agreed that it was appropriate in their clinical role to discuss financial concerns and 231 (88%) believed that these discussions were an important part of high-quality care. However, 73 (28%) stated that they did not have the appropriate information on support services or resources to facilitate such conversations, differing by occupation group; 7 (11%) social workers, 34 (44%) medical specialists, 18 (25%) nurses, and 14 (27%) of other occupations. Hindrances to discussing financial concerns were insufficient resources or support systems to refer to, followed by lack of time in a typical consultation.
Health professionals in cancer care commonly address the financial concerns of their patients but attitudes differed across occupations about their role, and frustrations were raised about available solutions. Resources supporting financial-related discussions for all health professionals are urgently needed to advance action in this field.
了解医疗专业人员对于解决患者癌症相关经济毒性这一话题的看法和当前做法。
通过澳大利亚临床肿瘤专业组织/网络开展了一项横断面在线调查。澳大利亚多学科临床肿瘤学会经济毒性工作组编制了25个问题,涉及患者与临床医生讨论的频率和舒适度、对自身角色的看法、所采用的策略以及为患者提供解决方案的障碍。采用描述性统计方法,并按职业群体进行亚组分析。
277名医疗专业人员完成了调查。大多数为女性(n = 213,77%),在公共机构工作(200人,72%),并在澳大利亚各地治疗各种癌症类型的患者。大多数参与者认为在其临床角色中讨论经济问题是合适的,231人(88%)认为这些讨论是高质量护理的重要组成部分。然而,73人(28%)表示他们没有关于支持服务或资源的适当信息来促进此类对话,不同职业群体存在差异;7名(11%)社会工作者、34名(44%)医学专家、18名(25%)护士以及14名(27%)其他职业人员。讨论经济问题的障碍包括可供参考的资源或支持系统不足,其次是在典型会诊中时间不足。
癌症护理领域的医疗专业人员通常会关注患者的经济问题,但不同职业对自身角色的态度存在差异,并且对现有解决方案感到沮丧。迫切需要为所有医疗专业人员提供支持与经济相关讨论的资源,以推动该领域的行动。