Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne and Dusseldorf, German CLL Study Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Division of CLL, Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 3;28(19):4203-4211. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0433.
With the advent of highly efficacious time-limited combination treatments of targeted agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has gained importance as a measure for therapeutic success and as a surrogate for progression-free survival. The currently most widely used method is multicolor flow cytometry, which detects circulating CLL cells in the peripheral blood. However, it seems to be less sensitive for the detection of MRD in the lymph node compartment.
To evaluate whether a cell-free approach can overcome this limitation, we performed serial assessments of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax in the phase II CLL2-BAAG trial. Patient-specific variability, diversity, joining (VDJ) rearrangements as well as somatic driver mutations were tracked before, during and after treatment by digital droplet PCR in blood plasma. Furthermore, these were systematically compared to matched flow cytometry data.
In the 381 sample pairs, ctDNA and flow cytometry yielded highly concordant results. However, clone-specific ctDNA was detected in 44 of 152 samples (29%) that were assessed as undetectable MRD (uMRD) by flow cytometry (defined as less than one CLL cell in 10,000 normal leukocytes). 29 ctDNA-negative samples showed detectable MRD >10-4 by flow cytometry. Also, somatic driver mutations were detected with a similar sensitivity compared with patient-specific VDJ rearrangements in plasma. In patients with predominantly nodal residual disease, ctDNA compared favorably with 4-color flow cytometry and seemed to more accurately reflect the entire disease burden across compartments.
On the basis of these findings, ctDNA-based MRD assessment appears to be a promising method to complement cell-based MRD approaches like flow cytometry that focus on circulating CLL cells in the peripheral blood.
随着针对慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的高效限时联合靶向治疗药物的出现,微小残留病(MRD)评估作为治疗成功的衡量标准和无进展生存的替代指标变得越来越重要。目前最广泛使用的方法是多色流式细胞术,它可以检测外周血中的循环 CLL 细胞。然而,它似乎对淋巴结部位的 MRD 检测不够敏感。
为了评估无细胞方法是否可以克服这一限制,我们在 CLL2-BAAG 试验中对接受奥滨尤妥珠单抗、阿卡替尼和维奈托克治疗的 CLL 患者进行了连续循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)评估。通过数字液滴 PCR 在血浆中跟踪患者特异性变异、多样性、连接(VDJ)重排以及体细胞驱动突变,在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后进行分析。此外,还将其与匹配的流式细胞术数据进行了系统比较。
在 381 对样本中,ctDNA 和流式细胞术的结果高度一致。然而,在通过流式细胞术评估为微小残留病(uMRD)不可检测(定义为每 10000 个正常白细胞中少于一个 CLL 细胞)的 152 个样本中的 44 个(29%)中检测到克隆特异性 ctDNA。29 个 ctDNA 阴性样本的流式细胞术检测到的 MRD>10-4。此外,与血浆中的患者特异性 VDJ 重排相比,体细胞驱动突变的检测也具有相似的灵敏度。在主要为淋巴结残留疾病的患者中,ctDNA 与 4 色流式细胞术相比具有优势,并且似乎更准确地反映了整个疾病负担在各部位的分布情况。
基于这些发现,ctDNA 为基础的 MRD 评估似乎是一种很有前途的方法,可以补充以流式细胞术为基础的细胞 MRD 方法,后者主要集中在外周血中的循环 CLL 细胞上。