Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia.
Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Aug 1;42(7):e762-e766. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002184. Epub 2022 May 20.
Guided growth is commonly performed by placing an extraperiosteal 2-hole plate across the growth plate with one epiphyseal and one metaphyseal screw. Recent studies investigated the efficacy of the removal of the metaphyseal screw only (sleeper plate) after correction. They concluded the practice to be unnecessary as only 19% of patients showed recurrence of deformity. This study aims to examine the incidence of rebound and undesired bony in-growth of the plate (tethering) after metaphyseal screw removal only.
In this retrospective case series, patient data on 144 plates inserted around the knee were obtained. Plates still in situ (n=69) at the time of study and full hardware removal (n=50) were excluded. The remaining 25 plates had only the metaphyseal screw removed after completed deformity correction. We analyzed the rate of tethering, rebound, and maintenance of correction in 2 age groups at latest follow (mean of 3.5 y). The Fisher exact test with Freeman-Halton extension was used to analyze categorical data and the Student t test for descriptive variables.
Twenty-five plates were identified as "sleeper plates" in our series. Thirteen plates (52%) maintained the achieved correction after a mean of 21 months (range: 4 to 39 mo), 9 plates (36%) required screw reinsertion due to rebound after a mean of 22 months (range: 12 to 48 mo) from screw removal, and 4 plates (16%) showed tethering with undesired continuation of guided growth after a mean of 14 months (range: 7 to 22 mo) from screw removal. Younger patients (<8 y at time of plate insertion) had higher rates of rebound and tethering ( P =0.0112, Fisher exact test). All tethering occurred in titanium plates, none occurred in steel plates.
The sleeper plate is an acceptable treatment strategy for coronal deformities around the knee, however, tethering and rebound may occur, especially in younger patients. Titanium plates may increase the risk of tethering, however, further long-term follow-up is needed as there were only 6 steel plates versus 19 titanium in this study. We stress the importance of close postoperative follow-up to identify signs of tethering and rebound early to prevent over-correction.
Level IV-retrospective case study.
引导生长通常通过在生长板上放置一个额外的骨膜 2 孔板来实现,该板横跨骺板,有一个骺板螺钉和一个干骺端螺钉。最近的研究调查了仅去除干骺端螺钉(睡眠板)后纠正的效果。他们得出的结论是这种做法是不必要的,因为只有 19%的患者出现畸形复发。本研究旨在检查仅去除干骺端螺钉后是否会出现反弹和板(系留)的不希望的骨内生长(拴系)。
在这项回顾性病例系列研究中,我们获得了 144 个膝关节周围插入的钢板的患者数据。在研究时仍在位(n=69)和完全去除内固定(n=50)的钢板被排除在外。其余 25 个在完成畸形矫正后仅去除干骺端螺钉。我们分析了 2 个年龄组在末次随访时(平均 3.5 年)的拴系、反弹和矫正维持率。使用 Fisher 确切检验(Freeman-Halton 扩展)分析分类数据,使用学生 t 检验分析描述性变量。
我们的研究系列中确定了 25 个“睡眠板”。13 个钢板(52%)在平均 21 个月(范围:4 至 39 个月)后维持了所获得的矫正,9 个钢板(36%)在平均 22 个月(范围:12 至 48 个月)后因去除螺钉后的反弹而需要重新插入螺钉,4 个钢板(16%)在去除螺钉后平均 14 个月(范围:7 至 22 个月)后出现了拴系,导致引导生长的不希望的继续。年龄较小的患者(<8 岁)的反弹和拴系发生率更高(P=0.0112,Fisher 确切检验)。所有拴系均发生在钛板中,无钢钢板发生。
对于膝关节周围的冠状畸形,睡眠板是一种可接受的治疗策略,然而,可能会发生拴系和反弹,尤其是在年龄较小的患者中。钛板可能会增加拴系的风险,但需要进一步的长期随访,因为本研究中只有 6 个钢钢板和 19 个钛板。我们强调密切术后随访的重要性,以早期发现拴系和反弹的迹象,防止过度矫正。
IV 级-回顾性病例研究。