• Suppr超能文献
  • 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
定价套餐&价格
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Win 客户端微信小程序
定价
会员套餐积分包API 积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

正在获取文献详情

最多等待 10 秒,若超时请稍后重试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正在获取文献详情

最多等待 10 秒,若超时请稍后重试。

虚假时间邀请:6 至 9 岁受虐儿童倾向于将提及“时间”的邀请误解为仅请求传统时间信息。

Pseudotemporal Invitations: 6- to 9-year-Old Maltreated Children's Tendency to Misinterpret Invitations Referencing "Time" as Solely Requesting Conventional Temporal Information.

作者信息

Kelly McWilliams, Shanna Williams, Hayden M Henderson, Angela D Evans, Thomas D Lyon

机构信息

Department of Psychology, 14775John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.

Educational and Counselling Psychology, 5620McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2023 May;28(2):265-274. doi: 10.1177/10775595221104829. Epub 2022 May 23.

DOI:10.1177/10775595221104829
PMID:35607755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10072137/
Abstract

Forensic interviewers ask children broad input-free recall questions about individual episodes in order to elicit complete narratives, often asking about "the first time," "the last time," and "one time." An overlooked problem is that the word "time" is potentially ambiguous, referring both to a particular episode and to conventional temporal information. We examined 191 6-9-year-old maltreated children's responses to questions about recent events varying the wording of the invitations, either asking children to "tell me about" or "tell me what happened" one time/the first time/the last time the child experienced recent recurrent events. Additionally, half of the children were asked a series of "when" questions about recurrent events before the invitations. Children were several times more likely to provide exclusively conventional temporal information to "tell me about" invitations compared to "tell me what happened" invitations, and asking "when" questions before the invitations increased children's tendency to give exclusively conventional temporal information. Children who answered a higher proportion of "when" questions with conventional temporal information were also more likely to do so in response to the invitations. The results suggest that children may often fail to provide narrative information because they misinterpret invitations using the word "time."

摘要

法庭口译员会向儿童提出广泛的、无需提示的回忆问题,以引出完整的叙述,通常会询问“第一次”、“最后一次”和“某一次”。一个被忽视的问题是,“时间”一词可能存在歧义,既指特定的事件,也指传统的时间信息。我们研究了 191 名 6-9 岁受虐待儿童对不同措辞的邀请的反应,邀请的措辞要么是“告诉我一次”,要么是“告诉我发生了什么”,一次/第一次/最后一次孩子经历了最近的反复事件。此外,一半的孩子在邀请前被问到一系列关于反复事件的“何时”问题。与“告诉我发生了什么”的邀请相比,孩子们更有可能只提供传统的时间信息来回答“告诉我”的邀请,而且在邀请前询问“何时”问题会增加孩子们只提供传统时间信息的倾向。那些用传统时间信息回答更多“何时”问题的孩子也更有可能在回答邀请时这样做。研究结果表明,孩子们可能经常无法提供叙述信息,因为他们误解了“时间”这个词的邀请。

相关文献

1Pseudotemporal Invitations: 6- to 9-year-Old Maltreated Children's Tendency to Misinterpret Invitations Referencing "Time" as Solely Requesting Conventional Temporal Information.PubMed译虚假时间邀请:6 至 9 岁受虐儿童倾向于将提及“时间”的邀请误解为仅请求传统时间信息。

Kelly McWilliams, Shanna Williams, Hayden M Henderson, et al.
Child Maltreat. 2023 May;28(2):265-274. doi: 10.1177/10775595221104829. Epub 2022 May 23.

24- to 15-year-old children's misinterpretation of invitations asking "about the time" as requests for temporal information in forensic interviews.PubMed译4 至 15 岁儿童对邀请中“关于时间”的误解,以为是在法庭讯问中请求提供时间信息。

Owen W Friend, Hayden M Henderson, Thomas D Lyon
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105675. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105675. Epub 2022 May 25.

3Forensic Interviewers' Difficulty With Invitations: Faux Invitations and Negative Recasting.PubMed译访谈员在邀请时的困难:虚假邀请和负面重铸。

Hayden M Henderson, Natalie Russo, Thomas D Lyon
Child Maltreat. 2020 Aug;25(3):363-372. doi: 10.1177/1077559519895593. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

4The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.PubMed译承诺讲真话、假定的供述以及回忆和识别问题对受虐待和未受虐待儿童披露轻微违规行为的影响。

J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:266-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

5Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.PubMed译儿童对性虐待的披露:从直接询问中学习。

Paula Schaeffer, John M Leventhal, Andrea Gottsegen Asnes
Child Abuse Negl. 2011 May;35(5):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.014.

6Increasing maltreated and nonmaltreated children's recall disclosures of a minor transgression: The effects of back-channel utterances, a promise to tell the truth, and a post-recall putative confession.PubMed译增加受虐待和未受虐待儿童对轻微违规行为的回忆披露:回应语、承诺说实话和事后假定自白对回忆的影响。

Kelly McWilliams, Stacia N Stolzenberg, Shanna Williams, et al.
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jun;116(Pt 1):104073. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104073. Epub 2019 Aug 11.

7Ask versus tell: Potential confusion when child witnesses are questioned about conversations.PubMed译询问与告知:当询问儿童证人关于对话的情况时可能存在的混淆。

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2017 Dec;23(4):447-459. doi: 10.1037/xap0000136. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

8Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.PubMed译儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

9The Effects of the Hypothetical Putative Confession and Negatively Valenced Yes/No Questions on Maltreated and Nonmaltreated Children's Disclosure of a Minor Transgression.PubMed译假设性的推定供述及负性效价的是/否问题对受虐待和未受虐待儿童披露轻微违规行为的影响。

Child Maltreat. 2017 May;22(2):167-173. doi: 10.1177/1077559516673734. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

10Eliciting maltreated and nonmaltreated children's transgression disclosures: narrative practice rapport building and a putative confession.PubMed译引出受虐待和未受虐待儿童的违规行为披露:叙事实践建立融洽关系与一种假定的供认。

et al.
Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1756-69. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12223. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

相关文献

1Adults' interpretation of invitations using the word 'time'.PubMed译成年人对使用“时间”一词的邀请的理解。

et al.
Child Abuse Rev. 2024 May-Jun;33(3). doi: 10.1002/car.2869. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

相关文献

1Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.PubMed译儿童对理解不足的信号表达:面试指导期间练习题的诊断性

Child Maltreat. 2021 Feb;26(1):95-104. doi: 10.1177/1077559520971350. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

2"This Incident Happened When There Were 10 People in the House?" Exploring a Framework to Categorize Defense Attorneys' Plausibility Questioning in CSA Trials.PubMed译“这起事件发生时房子里有10个人?”探索一种在CSA审判中对辩护律师合理性质疑进行分类的框架。

Psychol Crime Law. 2024;30(6):556-582. doi: 10.1080/1068316x.2022.2104277. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

3Interviewing Asylum-Seeking Children: A Scoping Review of Research to Inform Best Practices.PubMed译**采访寻求庇护的儿童:为最佳实践提供信息的研究范围综述**

Shayla Chilliak, Sabrina Musacchio, Tina Montreuil, et al.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3680-3695. doi: 10.1177/15248380241260014. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

44- to 15-year-old children's misinterpretation of invitations asking "about the time" as requests for temporal information in forensic interviews.PubMed译4 至 15 岁儿童对邀请中“关于时间”的误解,以为是在法庭讯问中请求提供时间信息。

Owen W Friend, Hayden M Henderson, Thomas D Lyon
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105675. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105675. Epub 2022 May 25.

2Forensic Interviewers' Difficulty With Invitations: Faux Invitations and Negative Recasting.PubMed译访谈员在邀请时的困难:虚假邀请和负面重铸。

Hayden M Henderson, Natalie Russo, Thomas D Lyon
Child Maltreat. 2020 Aug;25(3):363-372. doi: 10.1177/1077559519895593. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

3Adults' Perceptions of Children's Referentially Ambiguous Responses.PubMed译成年人对儿童指代不明回应的认知。

et al.
Psychol Crime Law. 2019;25(7):729-738. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1552757. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

4Pragmatic Failure and Referential Ambiguity when Attorneys Ask Child Witnesses "Do You Know/Remember" Questions.PubMed译律师询问儿童证人“你知道/记得”类问题时的语用失误与指称歧义

Psychol Public Policy Law. 2017 May;23(2):191-199. doi: 10.1037/law0000116. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

5The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yes/no Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children's Reports of a Minor Transgression.PubMed译秘密指示和是非问题对受虐待和未受虐待儿童关于轻微违规行为报告的影响

et al.
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Nov;34(6):784-802. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2277.

6Talking past each other: Interviewer and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews.PubMed译各说各话:法医询问中访谈者与儿童的言语交流

Law Hum Behav. 2016 Apr;40(2):107-17. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000171. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

7Young children's difficulty with indirect speech acts: implications for questioning child witnesses.PubMed译幼儿在间接言语行为方面的困难:对询问儿童证人的启示。

et al.
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):775-88. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2142. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

8MALTREATED CHILDREN'S ABILITY TO ESTIMATE TEMPORAL LOCATION AND NUMEROSITY OF PLACEMENT CHANGES AND COURT VISITS.PubMed译受虐待儿童对安置变化和法庭探视的时间定位及数量的估计能力。

et al.
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2012 Feb 1;18(1):79-104. doi: 10.1037/a0024812.

9Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).PubMed译模型选择和心理学理论:讨论赤池信息量准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息量准则(BIC)之间的差异。

Scott I Vrieze
Psychol Methods. 2012 Jun;17(2):228-43. doi: 10.1037/a0027127. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

10The development of communicative and narrative skills among preschoolers: lessons from forensic interviews about child abuse.PubMed译学龄前儿童交际和叙事技能的发展:从关于虐待儿童的法医访谈中得到的启示。

Irit Hershkowitz, Michael E Lamb, Yael Orbach, et al.
Child Dev. 2012 Mar-Apr;83(2):611-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01704.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19.