Suppr超能文献

重症患者通过白细胞介素-6 或 C 反应蛋白评估全身炎症:来自 FROG-ICU 研究的结果。

Systemic Inflammation Evaluated by Interleukin-6 or C-Reactive Protein in Critically Ill Patients: Results From the FROG-ICU Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Burn and Critical Care, University Hospitals Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, AP-HP, Paris, France.

UMR-S 942, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Cardiovascular Markers in Stressed Conditions (MASCOT), Paris University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 May 12;13:868348. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.868348. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of high concentration of interleukin-6 (IL-6) or C-reactive protein (CRP), two routinely available markers of systemic inflammation in the general population of critically ill patients, remains unclear. In a large cohort of critically ill patients including septic and non-septic patients, we assessed the relationship between baseline IL-6 or CRP and mortality, organ dysfunction, and the need for organ support.

METHODS

This was an ancillary analysis of the prospective French and euRopean Outcome reGistry in Intensive Care Units (FROG-ICU) study including patients with a requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation and/or vasoactive drug support for more than 24 h following intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary objective was to determine the association between baseline IL-6 or CRP concentration and survival until day 90. Secondary outcomes included organ dysfunction as evaluated by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and the need for organ support, including vasopressors/inotropes and/or renal replacement therapy (RRT).

RESULTS

Median IL-6 and CRP concentrations ( = 2,076) at baseline were 100.9 pg/ml (IQR 43.5-261.7) and 143.7 mg/L (IQR 78.6-219.8), respectively. Day-90 mortality was 30%. High IL-6 or CRP was associated with worse 90-day survival (hazard ratios 1.92 [1.63-2.26] and 1.21 [1.03-1.41], respectively), after adjustment on the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS-II). High IL-6 was also associated with the need for organ-support therapies, such as vasopressors/inotropes (OR 2.67 [2.15-3.31]) and RRT (OR 1.55 [1.26-1.91]), including when considering only patients independent from those supports at the time of IL-6 measurement. Associations between high CRP and organ support were inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

IL-6 appears to be preferred over CRP to evaluate critically ill patients' prognoses.

摘要

背景

白细胞介素-6(IL-6)或 C 反应蛋白(CRP)浓度高的预后影响,这两种标志物在危重病患者的普通人群中常用来评估全身性炎症,其作用仍不明确。在一项包含脓毒症和非脓毒症患者的大型危重病患者队列中,我们评估了基线 IL-6 或 CRP 与死亡率、器官功能障碍以及器官支持需求之间的关系。

方法

这是法国和欧洲重症监护病房预后登记研究(FROG-ICU)的辅助分析,该研究纳入了需要机械通气和/或血管活性药物支持超过 24 小时的患者。主要目的是确定基线 IL-6 或 CRP 浓度与 90 天生存的相关性。次要结局包括通过序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分评估的器官功能障碍,以及器官支持的需求,包括升压药/正性肌力药和/或肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。

结果

中位基线 IL-6 和 CRP 浓度( = 2076)分别为 100.9 pg/ml(IQR 43.5-261.7)和 143.7 mg/L(IQR 78.6-219.8)。90 天死亡率为 30%。校正简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS-II)后,高 IL-6 或 CRP 与 90 天生存不良相关(风险比 1.92 [1.63-2.26] 和 1.21 [1.03-1.41])。高 IL-6 还与器官支持治疗的需求相关,如升压药/正性肌力药(比值比 2.67 [2.15-3.31])和 RRT(比值比 1.55 [1.26-1.91]),包括在考虑 IL-6 测量时已独立于这些支持的患者。高 CRP 与器官支持之间的关联不一致。

结论

与 CRP 相比,IL-6 似乎更能评估危重病患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a90/9134087/d10937d0761a/fimmu-13-868348-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验