Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jul;164(7):1747-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05233-7. Epub 2022 May 30.
The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the pulsatility curve to predict shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid dynamics were derived from an automatic lumbar infusion test (LIT) protocol. All patients were treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunting and re-examined 6 months after shunting. Patient demographics and outcomes were gathered in a prospective, electronic database that spanned from January 2012 to January 2020. A validated iNPH scale was used to assess patients preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The relationship of the relative pulse pressure coefficient (RPPC), delta amplitude, successful lowering of amplitude, and the pressure-value at a hypothetical amplitude of zero (P), resistance to outflow (R), and outcome, were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
We included 38 patients. The RPPC, delta amplitude, successful lowering of amplitude, and P parameters did not predict shunt response. Mean P was 0.5 (IQR 0.4-0.9) in improved patients and 0.4 (IQR 0-1.2) in non-improved patients. The delta amplitude was 0.16 kPa (IQR 0.10-0.23) in improved patients and 0.18 kPa (IQR 0.11-0.24) in non-improved patients. Furthermore, we found a technical failure rate of pulsatility curve measurements of 32%.
Pulsatility curve results were not suitable in predicting shunt response in our cohort. The diagnostic value of LIT in case of normal pressure hydrocephalus should be subject to more rigorous research.
本研究旨在探讨搏动曲线对特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者分流反应的诊断准确性。
从自动腰椎输注试验(LIT)方案中得出腰椎脑脊液动力学。所有患者均接受脑室腹腔分流术治疗,并在分流后 6 个月进行复查。前瞻性电子数据库收集了患者的人口统计学和结局数据,该数据库的时间范围为 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月。使用经验证的 iNPH 量表在术前和术后 6 个月评估患者。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估相对脉冲压力系数(RPPC)、delta 幅度、幅度降低成功率以及假定幅度为零的压力值(P)、流出阻力(R)与结局的关系。
我们纳入了 38 例患者。RPPC、delta 幅度、幅度降低成功率和 P 参数均不能预测分流反应。改善患者的平均 P 值为 0.5(IQR 0.4-0.9),未改善患者的 P 值为 0.4(IQR 0-1.2)。改善患者的 delta 幅度为 0.16 kPa(IQR 0.10-0.23),未改善患者的 delta 幅度为 0.18 kPa(IQR 0.11-0.24)。此外,我们发现搏动曲线测量的技术失败率为 32%。
在我们的队列中,搏动曲线结果不适合预测分流反应。LIT 在正常压力脑积水中的诊断价值需要更严格的研究。