Suppr超能文献

家长和治疗师对四种幼儿动力移动设备的满意度。

Parents' and Therapists' Satisfaction with Four Early Childhood Power Mobility Devices.

出版信息

Can J Occup Ther. 2022 Dec;89(4):364-375. doi: 10.1177/00084174221098879. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Abstract

Little is known about satisfaction with power mobility devices used by young children. Parents' and therapists' satisfaction with four early childhood power mobility devices were examined. A two-phased study, comprising Trial Phase cross-sectional design and Loan Phase one-group pretest-posttest design. Parents and therapists of children 9 months to 6 years with mobility limitations completed the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction of Assistive Technology 2.0 Device Subscale (QUEST8) plus an additional device Aesthetics rating. Seventy-four parents and 42 therapists from 18 child development and rehabilitation centres participated. Parent and therapist median QUEST8 and Aesthetics scores varied across devices when trialled and over the six-month loan. Favourable median ratings had no statistically significant differences between parents and therapists. Parent ratings decreased statistically over loan period although therapists' ratings did not. Device dimensions, safety, and aesthetics were highly rated. Similarities and differences exist among parent and therapist ratings.

摘要

对于儿童使用的动力移动设备的满意度,人们知之甚少。本研究考察了家长和治疗师对四种幼儿动力移动设备的满意度。研究采用两阶段设计,包括试验阶段的横断面设计和贷款阶段的单组前后测设计。9 个月至 6 岁有移动障碍的儿童的家长和治疗师完成了魁北克辅助技术满意度评估 2.0 设备分量表(QUEST8)以及额外的设备美学评分。18 个儿童发展和康复中心的 74 名家长和 42 名治疗师参与了研究。当试用和在六个月的贷款期间,家长和治疗师的 QUEST8 和美学评分中位数因设备而异。有利的中位数评分在家长和治疗师之间没有统计学上的显著差异。尽管治疗师的评分没有统计学意义,但在贷款期间,家长的评分确实下降了。设备尺寸、安全性和美学得到了高度评价。家长和治疗师的评分存在相似之处和差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/753e/9709530/3351569fc85e/10.1177_00084174221098879-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验