• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测急性肾绞痛急诊冲击波碎石术成功的因素。

Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3
PMID:35657411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9300550/
Abstract

The role of emergency shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in persistent pain control in patients with ureteral stones is not well established. The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy as well as the predicting variables for successful early SWL patients with symptomatic ureteral stones. Eighty-six patients with a persistent renal colic secondary to single ureteral stone (6-12 mm) were prospectively enrolled in this study. SWL was performed within 24 h of the onset of flank pain. Pain control and stone-free rate after emergency SWL session were 58.1% and 44.2%, respectively. Seven patients required post-SWL ureteroscopy and ureteral stent placement for uncontrolled pain. The overall 3-month stone-free rate after SWL monotherapy was 83.7%. On multivariate analysis, predictors for pain relief after emergency SWL were lower Hounsfield (HU) stone density, mild hydronephrosis (HN) at presentation and presentation during the first colic episode. Lower HU stone density was the single predictor of successful stone clearance after single emergency SWL session on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, early SWL is feasible and effective in management of ureteral stones presented by renal colic with low HU.

摘要

急诊冲击波碎石术(SWL)在控制输尿管结石患者持续性疼痛中的作用尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在评估对于有症状的输尿管结石患者,早期成功进行 SWL 的疗效和预测因素。

本研究前瞻性纳入了 86 例因单一输尿管结石(6-12mm)而继发持续性肾绞痛的患者。SWL 在腰痛发作后 24 小时内进行。急诊 SWL 后疼痛控制和结石清除率分别为 58.1%和 44.2%。7 例患者因疼痛未得到控制而需要进行 post-SWL 输尿管镜检查和输尿管支架置入术。SWL 单一疗法后 3 个月的总体结石清除率为 83.7%。多变量分析显示,急诊 SWL 后疼痛缓解的预测因素为较低的亨氏单位(HU)结石密度、轻度肾积水(HN)和首次绞痛发作时就诊。多变量分析显示,HU 结石密度较低是单次急诊 SWL 后结石清除成功的唯一预测因素。

总之,对于低 HU 的肾绞痛患者,早期 SWL 是一种可行且有效的输尿管结石治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic.预测急性肾绞痛急诊冲击波碎石术成功的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy a Treatment Option for Renal Colic?体外冲击波碎石术是肾绞痛的治疗选择吗?
Arch Esp Urol. 2023 May;76(3):175-181. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.20.
3
A prospective randomized comparison between early (<48 hours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience.一项针对症状性上尿路结石的前瞻性随机比较:早期(绞痛发作后<48 小时)与延迟冲击波碎石术的比较:单中心经验。
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2059-66. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0066. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
4
Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones?我们能否预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石后的辅助治疗?
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Dec 27;94(4):439-442. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.4.439.
5
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
6
Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.输尿管结石:体外冲击波碎石术治疗
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Mar;83(1):10-3.
7
Noninvasive management of obstructing ureteral stones using electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.使用电磁体外冲击波碎石术对梗阻性输尿管结石进行无创治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2008 May;22(5):1339-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9766-6. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.绞痛疼痛作为预测输尿管结石单次冲击波碎石术结石清除率的重要因素的影响:贝叶斯逻辑回归模型分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123800. eCollection 2015.
9
Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石(TISU):一项多中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
Emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi: a retrospective study.输尿管结石所致急性肾绞痛的急诊输尿管镜碎石术:一项回顾性研究
Urol Res. 2011 Dec;39(6):497-501. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0381-y. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对有症状的输尿管结石患者行急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗结局的预测模型的开发和验证:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 31;51(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01401-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Immediate Shockwave Lithotripsy Delayed Shockwave Lithotripsy After Urgent Ureteral Stenting in Patients with Ureteral or Pyeloureteral Urolithiasis: A Matched-Pair Analysis.输尿管或肾盂输尿管结石患者紧急输尿管支架置入术后立即冲击波碎石术与延迟冲击波碎石术:配对分析
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):721-727. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0384. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as opposed to delayed shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of acute renal colic due to obstructive ureteral stone: a prospective randomized trial.与延迟冲击波碎石术相比,急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻性结石所致急性肾绞痛的前瞻性随机试验。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Oct;70(5):526-533. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03084-9. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
4
Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.急诊与延迟碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻结石:荟萃分析比较研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.全球结石病的流行病学。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
National Practice Pattern and Time Trends in Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Calculi in Korea: a Nationwide Population-Based Study.韩国上尿路结石治疗的全国实践模式及时间趋势:一项基于全国人口的研究
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(12):1989-1995. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.1989.
7
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的诊断和保守治疗管理。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
9
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和非阿片类药物用于急性肾绞痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2.
10
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Urology. 2015 Apr;85(4):748-56. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.041. Epub 2015 Feb 10.